2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and recent diversification of curassows, guans, and chachalacas (Galliformes: Cracidae) out of Mesoamerica: Phylogeny inferred from mitochondrial, intron, and ultraconserved element sequences

Abstract: The Cracidae (curassows, guans, and chachalacas) include some of the most spectacular and endangered Neotropical bird species. They lack a comprehensive phylogenetic hypothesis, hence their geographic origin and the history of their diversification remain unclear. We present a species-level phylogeny of Cracidae inferred from a matrix of 430 ultraconserved elements (UCEs; at least one species sampled per genus) and eight more variable loci (introns and mtDNA; all available species). We use this phylogeny along… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected the optimal partitioning scheme using the Bayesian information criterion and the rclusterf algorithm [43] in PARTITIONFINDER 2.0-pre11 [44], and quantified support with 100 thorough bootstrap replicates. We implemented MCMCtree (PAML 4.8 [45]) using a relaxed clock and six galliform fossil calibrations [30,46] to calibrate minimum node ages (electronic supplementary material, table S2) and infer an ultrametric, timecalibrated phylogeny. We restricted analysis to the largest single DNA sequence partition identified by PARTITIONFINDER to reduce among-site rate heterogeneity and computation time.…”
Section: (B) Phylogenetic Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We selected the optimal partitioning scheme using the Bayesian information criterion and the rclusterf algorithm [43] in PARTITIONFINDER 2.0-pre11 [44], and quantified support with 100 thorough bootstrap replicates. We implemented MCMCtree (PAML 4.8 [45]) using a relaxed clock and six galliform fossil calibrations [30,46] to calibrate minimum node ages (electronic supplementary material, table S2) and infer an ultrametric, timecalibrated phylogeny. We restricted analysis to the largest single DNA sequence partition identified by PARTITIONFINDER to reduce among-site rate heterogeneity and computation time.…”
Section: (B) Phylogenetic Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continental vicariance of Madagascar and Australasia far preceded diversification of phasianoids [30] and modern birds in general [31][32][33], meaning Margaroperdix and Anurophasis ancestors must have crossed permanent marine barriers. How did these 'non-vagile' phasianoids come to inhabit their present insular distributions?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…protein-coding exons, non-coding regions, ultra-conserved elements [UCEs], or single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPS]) is an increasingly important issue when dealing with the challenges of analyzing large phylogenomic datasets. Each phylogenomic marker type may be useful at various timescales and may present different biases for analyses (Lemmon & Lemmon 2013;McCormack et al 2013;Hosner et al 2016). For example, there is debate over whether protein-coding or non-coding markers are more appropriate for phylogenetic analyses, because selection on protein-coding exons may mask homology and bias phylogenetic signal Chen et al 2017;Reddy et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both AHE and UCEs are now widely used in inferring phylogenies across broad and shallow phylogenetic scales Smith et al 2014;Brandley et al 2015;Prum et al 2015;Streicher et al 2018). For population genetics, UCEs have been used with some success (Hosner et al 2016;Zarza et al 2016;Andermann et al 2019). In contrast, AHE produces a smaller number of markers (less than 400 exons) and generally results in fewer independent variants as required by many types of analyses in comparison to these other sets of markers (Lanier & Knowles 2012;Hedge & Wilson 2014;Springer & Gatesy 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies considered Cracidae and Megapodiidae as a monophyletic group, and it was considered as a sister group of the rest of the Galliformes (Feduccia, 1999). However, the morphological and molecular studies suggest that cracids are a sister taxon of the clade (Numididae (Phasianidae Odontophoridae)) and the Megapodiidae is a sister group of other families (Dyke, Gulas, & Growe, 2003;Hosner, Braun, & Kimball, 2016;Stein, Brown, & Mooers, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%