2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and reliable analysis of underivatized amino acids in urine using tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several publications have reported AA analysis in foods and biological fluids using GC–MS, capillary electrophoresis, HILIC-MS/MS, ion-paired LC–MS/MS, electrochemical detection (CE), ion exchange chromatography, and HPLC. , Most of these methods depend on pre- or postcolumn derivatization to improve the detection sensitivity. However, elimination of derivatization steps attracts many researchers, and many studies have described the analysis of AAs without derivatization steps such as underivatized determination of free AAs in honey using LC–MS/MS, branched-chain AAs in maple syrup urine disease using LC–MS/MS, evaluation embryo viability using CE-MS, urine analysis by LC–MS/MS, ion exchange, CE-MS coupled to a porous layer-gold nanoparticle-modified chiral column, AAs and peptides in nutritive mixtures in the total parenteral nutrition solution, and online coupling of UV, fluorescence, and electrochemical detection . The elimination of the derivatization step is advantageous for many reasons as the selection of an appropriate derivatization reagent is challenging as the reagents differ in their selectivity toward each amino acid; also, additional peaks usually appear in chromatograms, side reactions usually occur, complete derivatization cannot be ensured, long sample preparation time is required, and unstable derivatizations occur.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several publications have reported AA analysis in foods and biological fluids using GC–MS, capillary electrophoresis, HILIC-MS/MS, ion-paired LC–MS/MS, electrochemical detection (CE), ion exchange chromatography, and HPLC. , Most of these methods depend on pre- or postcolumn derivatization to improve the detection sensitivity. However, elimination of derivatization steps attracts many researchers, and many studies have described the analysis of AAs without derivatization steps such as underivatized determination of free AAs in honey using LC–MS/MS, branched-chain AAs in maple syrup urine disease using LC–MS/MS, evaluation embryo viability using CE-MS, urine analysis by LC–MS/MS, ion exchange, CE-MS coupled to a porous layer-gold nanoparticle-modified chiral column, AAs and peptides in nutritive mixtures in the total parenteral nutrition solution, and online coupling of UV, fluorescence, and electrochemical detection . The elimination of the derivatization step is advantageous for many reasons as the selection of an appropriate derivatization reagent is challenging as the reagents differ in their selectivity toward each amino acid; also, additional peaks usually appear in chromatograms, side reactions usually occur, complete derivatization cannot be ensured, long sample preparation time is required, and unstable derivatizations occur.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of their study, the authors used LC-MS and GC-MS to determine the concentration of AAs in human urine. Compared with LC-MS, GC-MS has obvious advantages regarding analysis time; the whole process takes 2.8 min (1.5 min for analysis) [128].…”
Section: Ion-pair Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The run duration was 35 min, the flow rate was 150 μL/min, the injection volume was 5 μL, and the mobile phase was a combination of UHQ water (solution A) and (solution B) Methanol with 0.1% Heptafluorobutyric anhydride (v/v), respectively. The detected AAs were asparagine, serine, aspartic acid, glycine, threonine, alanine, proline, His, lysine, valine, arginine, methionine, leucine, Tyr, phenylalanine, and Trp, and their RT was in the range of 5.3–15 min [29]. Using an LC/MS technique, Fleszar et al.…”
Section: Bioanalytical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%