2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02749.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and sensitive detection of Vibrio cholerae by loop-mediated isothermal amplification targeted to the gene of outer membrane protein ompW

Abstract: Aims:  The present study was aimed to develop a loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for rapid and specific detection of Vibrio cholerae. Methods and Results:  A set of five designed primers that recognized specifically the V. cholerae ompW gene was used. The optimized time and temperature conditions for the LAMP assay were 75 min at 65°C, respectively. The LAMP method accurately identified 16 isolates of V. cholerae but did not detect 28 non‐cholerae Vibrio isolates and 37 non‐Vibrio bacterial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
27
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of V. parahaemolyticus, the detection limit of dLAMP-LFD in pure culture was 4.1 CFU per reaction, which was 100 times more sensitive than that of dPCR. Additionally, the detection limit of dLAMP-LFD in a pure culture was also equivalent to results in previous reports of LAMP detection in Pseudomonas putida (4.8 CFU per reaction: Mao et al 2012) and V. cholerae (8 CFU per reaction: Srisuk et al 2010) and in the triplex-LAMP detection of V. harveyi, V. anguillarum, and V. alginolyticus (5 CFU per reaction: Yu et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of V. parahaemolyticus, the detection limit of dLAMP-LFD in pure culture was 4.1 CFU per reaction, which was 100 times more sensitive than that of dPCR. Additionally, the detection limit of dLAMP-LFD in a pure culture was also equivalent to results in previous reports of LAMP detection in Pseudomonas putida (4.8 CFU per reaction: Mao et al 2012) and V. cholerae (8 CFU per reaction: Srisuk et al 2010) and in the triplex-LAMP detection of V. harveyi, V. anguillarum, and V. alginolyticus (5 CFU per reaction: Yu et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This technique uses the strand displacement activity of Bst DNA polymerase and primers that are specific to six regions on the target DNA under conditions with constant temperature (Notomi et al 2000). The LAMP technique has been used for the identification of various bacteria causing diseases in aquatic animals (Yamazaki et al 2008a;Han and Ge 2010;Srisuk et al 2010;Yongjum et al 2010;Prompamorn et al 2011;Surasilp et al 2011;Mao et al 2012). Typically, LAMP amplicons are monitored by agarose gel electrophoresis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5–7 times higher than that of LAMP assay for Vibrio harveyi in added shellfish cultures (17·2 CFU per reaction; Cao et al. 2010) and V. cholerae in spiked shrimp sample (20 CFU per reaction; Srisuk et al. 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…OmpW is an outer membrane protein that serves as a receptor for Escherichia coli colicin S4 (4). The ompW gene has served as a species-specific gene of V. cholerae in many detection studies (5,6). This gene was found to have an 11-bp deletion in the PT6 strains, but the deletion was not detected in any PT1 strain (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%