2013
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1214609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Blood-Pressure Lowering in Patients with Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Abstract: Artículo de publicación ISIBackground Whether rapid lowering of elevated blood pressure would improve the outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage is not known. Methods We randomly assigned 2839 patients who had had a spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage within the previous 6 hours and who had elevated systolic blood pressure to receive intensive treatment to lower their blood pressure (with a target systolic level of <140 mm Hg within 1 hour) or guideline-recommended treatment (with a target … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

19
880
2
38

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,353 publications
(939 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
19
880
2
38
Order By: Relevance
“…They are also consistent with larger trials in ICH, which indicate that rapid BP reduction is not associated with worse clinical outcomes. 33,34 This study has a number of limitations. Estimation of OEF max using CTP source data is an indirect measurement, based on the flow , maximum cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen; OEF max , maximum oxygen extraction fraction.…”
Section: Blood Pressure and Perihematoma Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They are also consistent with larger trials in ICH, which indicate that rapid BP reduction is not associated with worse clinical outcomes. 33,34 This study has a number of limitations. Estimation of OEF max using CTP source data is an indirect measurement, based on the flow , maximum cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen; OEF max , maximum oxygen extraction fraction.…”
Section: Blood Pressure and Perihematoma Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Methodological differences between our retrospective analysis and the larger gold standard trials, INTERACT 24 and ATACH 2,6 also may limit our conclusions and applications. Our sample size was modest, retrospectively evaluated, and nonrandomized, with a significant number of patients removed because of inadequate renal monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A rightward shift in cerebral autoregulation may occur because of both chronic hypertension19 and stroke 20. Although the results of INTERACT 2 appeared to contradict the long‐standing belief that intensive SBP control would exacerbate perihematomal ischemia,4 cautious and stepwise blood pressure reduction has long been recommended in the management of malignant hypertension21, 22 and hypertensive encephalopathy 8, 10, 23. The current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines do not offer recommendations on SBP reduction in patients presenting with SBPs >220 mm Hg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rate of death or disability among patients randomly assigned to intensive reduction in the systolic bloodpressure level, with a target systolic blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg within 1 hour, was nonsignificantly lower than the rate among those assigned to guideline-recommended treatment, with a target systolic blood pressure of less than 180 mm Hg, with the use of a variety of antihypertensive medications (absolute difference, 3.6 percentage points; P = 0.06). 5 We designed the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage II (ATACH-2) trial 6 to determine the efficacy of rapidly lowering the systolic blood-pressure level in patients in an earlier time window after symptom onset than that evaluated in previous trials. 4,5,7 The trial was based on evidence that hematoma expansion and the rate of subsequent death or disability might be reduced with very early and more aggressive reduction in the systolic blood-pressure level 8,9 among persons at high risk owing to a high systolic blood-pressure level (≥170 mm Hg10 to ≥200 mm Hg 11 ) at presentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%