2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-016-0762-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid building detection using machine learning

Abstract: Abstract. This work describes algorithms for performing discrete object detection, specifically in the case of buildings, where usually only low quality RGB-only geospatial reflective imagery is available. We utilize new candidate search and feature extraction techniques to reduce the problem to a machine learning (ML) classification task. Here we can harness the complex patterns of contrast features contained in training data to establish a model of buildings. We avoid costly sliding windows to generate candi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A classifier of MSCNs is designed for building detection in this study due to its capability of non-linear estimation and the robustness of object classification under complex backgrounds. Another classifier, named Random Forest, has been proven to perform efficiently in the classification of building and non-building regions in the literature [59], in which an experiment comparing Random Forest with MSCNs was conducted to test the effectiveness of the MSCN classifier. Multiple features were extracted to classify using Random Forest and compared to deep features.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Mscns and Random Forest Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A classifier of MSCNs is designed for building detection in this study due to its capability of non-linear estimation and the robustness of object classification under complex backgrounds. Another classifier, named Random Forest, has been proven to perform efficiently in the classification of building and non-building regions in the literature [59], in which an experiment comparing Random Forest with MSCNs was conducted to test the effectiveness of the MSCN classifier. Multiple features were extracted to classify using Random Forest and compared to deep features.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Mscns and Random Forest Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various building detection algorithms have been developed, with cited precisions ranging from 80-90% [16]- [18]. Accurate algorithms rely on a combination of feature extraction techniques and machine learning.…”
Section: Google Earth Engine Simulator For Obstacle Location Extmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside preventing rasterization artefacts along the edges, another effect of the canonical orientation is that, no rotation invariants need to be learned during training.. Furthermore, the relation between X coordinate and Y coordinate can be enhanced, which can simplify the learning process and increase the training accuracy in some degree (Cohen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Preparation Of Input Rastersmentioning
confidence: 99%