2014
DOI: 10.1656/045.021.0101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Colonization of the Potomac River Drainage by the Rainbow Darter (Etheostoma caeruleum) Following Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed immigration of rainbow darter in 3 sites, including a site in karst terrain (Hopewell Run) suggesting the species’ physiological tolerance of a wide range of environmental conditions. Rainbow darter is considered non‐native within the Potomac River basin due to its rapid colonisation into major tributaries following the first observation in 1977 (Cessna et al, 2014), and our surveys provide additional support for assertion that the species is non‐native in the study area. We also observed the apparent extirpation of smallmouth bass in 3 sites (Dillons Creek lower and upper sites, Sleepy Creek lower site) and its persistence in 1 site (Brush Creek).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…We observed immigration of rainbow darter in 3 sites, including a site in karst terrain (Hopewell Run) suggesting the species’ physiological tolerance of a wide range of environmental conditions. Rainbow darter is considered non‐native within the Potomac River basin due to its rapid colonisation into major tributaries following the first observation in 1977 (Cessna et al, 2014), and our surveys provide additional support for assertion that the species is non‐native in the study area. We also observed the apparent extirpation of smallmouth bass in 3 sites (Dillons Creek lower and upper sites, Sleepy Creek lower site) and its persistence in 1 site (Brush Creek).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…) and only rainbow darter is known with high confidence to be introduced in the study area (Cessna et al. ). In contrast, all native species were unambiguously assigned as such based on historical records (Jenkins and Burkhead ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that 6 of the 9 increasing species are native (Table 5) and therefore cannot attribute our results solely to the expansion of introduced fishes. Moreover, 2 of the 3 increasing species categorized as nonnative are considered "introduced but possibly native" in the Potomac River basin (bluntnose minnow and greenside darter; Jenkins and Burkhead 1994, Starnes 2002, Starnes et al 2011) and only rainbow darter is known with high confidence to be introduced in the study area (Cessna et al 2014). In contrast, all native species were unambiguously assigned as such based on historical records (Jenkins and Notes: Abundance trends are interpreted by predicted 95% confidence intervals on b 1 relative to 0 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid spread of introduced darters may illustrate our underestimation of darter movement capabilities. E. variatum, E. caeruleum, and E. blenniodes have all been introduced beyond their native range and swiftly colonized their new watersheds (Gibson et al 2019;Cessna et al 2014;Beneteau et al 2012), indicating the possibility for dispersal capabilities that may be higher than expected.…”
Section: Population Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%