2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.07.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid colorimetric sensing platform for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes foodborne pathogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…innocua and promiscuity towards S. aureus, our data in the nanobrush system shows that the output signal is relatively low when compared to the capture of L. monocytogenes. 66 are rapid (including loop-mediated isothermal amplification or LAMP), with total analysis time of less than one hour, but with poor LOD values near 10 2 CFU-mL -1 . The LOD can be improved considerably with sample pretreatment 67 , but this adds to the analysis time, which is not desirable in a food processing environment.…”
Section: Biosensor Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…innocua and promiscuity towards S. aureus, our data in the nanobrush system shows that the output signal is relatively low when compared to the capture of L. monocytogenes. 66 are rapid (including loop-mediated isothermal amplification or LAMP), with total analysis time of less than one hour, but with poor LOD values near 10 2 CFU-mL -1 . The LOD can be improved considerably with sample pretreatment 67 , but this adds to the analysis time, which is not desirable in a food processing environment.…”
Section: Biosensor Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, many rapid analysis methods were developed for L. monocytogenes detection. Alhogail et al designed colorimetric biosensor to detect rapidly the amidolytic activity of Listeria protease [38]. The detection limit was found to be 2.17 × 10 2 cfu/mL in milk and meat samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of such methods would enable better control of such bacteria in milk, improving the quality of dairy products and decreasing the economic costs associated with rejection of spoiled milk. Bacteriological methods, immunological methods, and molecular methods, such as multiplex PCR and real-time PCR, have all been applied to the detection of microorganisms in food (Alhogail et al, 2016;Nagaraj et al, 2016;Xu et al, 2017). However, these methods are not always feasible for use on farm or in modest-sized microorganism testing laboratories because they are often expensive and require the use of bulky apparatus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%