2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid destruction of planetary debris around white dwarfs through aeolian erosion

Abstract: The discovery of numerous debris disks around white dwarfs (WDs), gave rise to extensive study of such disks and their role in polluting WDs, but the formation and evolution of these disks is not yet well understood. Here we study the role of aeolian (wind) erosion in the evolution of solids in WD debris disks. Aeolian erosion is a destructive process that plays a key role in shaping the properties and size-distribution of planetesimals, boulders and pebbles in gaseous protoplanetary disks. Our analysis of aeo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous mechanisms have been proposed to perturb material onto nearly star-crossing orbits, of which only wide stellar companions have been shown to be unimportant (Debes & Sigurdsson 2002;Bonsor et al 2011;Bonsor & Veras 2015;Petrovich & Muñoz 2017;Mustill et al 2018;Wilson et al 2019;Smallwood et al 2021). The details of subsequent disc formation are largely unconstrained, although theoretical efforts have produced plausible models (Veras et al 2014(Veras et al , 2015Malamud & Perets 2020a,b), where interactions between solids and gas appear to play a key role (Grishin & Veras 2019;Rozner et al 2021;Malamud et al 2021). Disc lifetimes are uncertain, with model predictions in the range 10 1 -10 6 yr (Rafikov 2011b;Wyatt et al 2014), and observational estimates in the range 10 4 -10 6 yr (Girven et al 2012;Cunningham et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous mechanisms have been proposed to perturb material onto nearly star-crossing orbits, of which only wide stellar companions have been shown to be unimportant (Debes & Sigurdsson 2002;Bonsor et al 2011;Bonsor & Veras 2015;Petrovich & Muñoz 2017;Mustill et al 2018;Wilson et al 2019;Smallwood et al 2021). The details of subsequent disc formation are largely unconstrained, although theoretical efforts have produced plausible models (Veras et al 2014(Veras et al , 2015Malamud & Perets 2020a,b), where interactions between solids and gas appear to play a key role (Grishin & Veras 2019;Rozner et al 2021;Malamud et al 2021). Disc lifetimes are uncertain, with model predictions in the range 10 1 -10 6 yr (Rafikov 2011b;Wyatt et al 2014), and observational estimates in the range 10 4 -10 6 yr (Girven et al 2012;Cunningham et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bodies which move within a gas disc are subject to a gas drag dependent on the relative velocity of the object and the gas. This gas drag can cause outer layers of the body to be lost analagous to aeolian erosive winds (Rozner et al 2021).…”
Section: Impactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These geometric details are crucial. They determine the type of debris structure formed (Malamud & Perets 2020a), the subsequent evolution of the rings and discs (Bochkarev & Rafikov 2011;Rafikov 2011a,b;Rafikov & Garmilla 2012;Kenyon & Bromley 2017a,b;Miranda & Rafikov 2018;Veras & Heng 2020;Malamud et al 2021;Rozner et al 2021;Trevascus et al 2021) and, ultimately, the accretion rates onto the photosphere. These rates are then used to reconstruct the chemical composition of the destroyed progenitor (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%