2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2007.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid detection of Atopobium vaginae and association with organisms implicated in bacterial vaginosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, not all healthy females have vaginal microbiota dominated by lactobacilli [5], and other lactic acid producers such as Atopobium vaginae, Leptotrichia and Megasphaera have also been suggested to assist in maintaining the acidity of the vagina, [30,31]. With BV considered a non-specific (predominantly anaerobic) polymicrobial infection and the identities of many of the vaginal microflora remaining elusive [32], determining the health of the vaginal ecosystem appears to be subjective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, not all healthy females have vaginal microbiota dominated by lactobacilli [5], and other lactic acid producers such as Atopobium vaginae, Leptotrichia and Megasphaera have also been suggested to assist in maintaining the acidity of the vagina, [30,31]. With BV considered a non-specific (predominantly anaerobic) polymicrobial infection and the identities of many of the vaginal microflora remaining elusive [32], determining the health of the vaginal ecosystem appears to be subjective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recognising only Gardnerella vaginalis as the overt pathogen in BV would be inaccurate, especially as G. vaginalis has shown a high sensitivity (100%) but low specificity (49%) for BV by also being detected in the absence of BV [14,16,28,47]. Synergy between G. vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae has been proposed as they are often detected together in BV [32,48,49,50,51,52] and only rarely has A. vaginae been detected in the absence of G. vaginalis [53] or in health [54,55]. A. vaginae was first implicated in BV in 2004, since then several studies have emerged associating this anaerobe with >80% of BV cases [54,56,57,58,59,60,61].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common aberrant condition associated with depletion of lactobacilli, elevated vaginal pH, and overgrowth of Atopobium, Mobiluncus, Prevotella, Gardnerella, and Megasphaera species (1,8,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Bradshaw et al (2006) supports a synergism between G. vaginalis and A. vaginae. Several researchers suggested that infection with A. vaginae is even more specific (and a diagnostically more valuable marker) for BV than infection with G. vaginalis (Bradshaw et al, 2006;Trama et al, 2008). These two species are strongly associated with bacterial biofilms (Swidsinski et al, 2005).…”
Section: Pathogenesis Of Bacterial Vaginosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Goffinet et al, 2003). Cultures of bacteria, such as G. vaginalis are of no value for BV diagnosis as women who are merely colonized with this bacterium will also have positive cultures, whereas other bacteria, such as A. vaginae are fastidious, which makes cultivation difficult (Donders, 2007;Trama et al, 2008). Molecular detection methods may be more expensive than the gold standard but allow better characterization of the vaginal flora by targeting genes (mainly the 16S rRNA sequence) of specific bacterial genera or species (Fredricks et al, 2007).…”
Section: Culture and Pcr Detection Of Bacteria Associated With Bactermentioning
confidence: 99%