2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.107871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid detection of fraudulence in seven commercial shrimp products by species-specific PCR assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…japonicus ) with a detection limit of 0.005 ng [ 8 ]. Wilwet et al (2021) described a detection limit of 0.1 ng for seven commercial shrimp species ( Penaeus monodon, P. vannamei, P. semisulcatus, Fenneropenaeus indicus, Metapenaeus affinis, M. rosenbergii, and H. gibbosus ) [ 15 ]. Compared with previous studies, ultrafast PCR yielded a similar or two orders of magnitude higher sensitivity than that of conventional PCR methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…japonicus ) with a detection limit of 0.005 ng [ 8 ]. Wilwet et al (2021) described a detection limit of 0.1 ng for seven commercial shrimp species ( Penaeus monodon, P. vannamei, P. semisulcatus, Fenneropenaeus indicus, Metapenaeus affinis, M. rosenbergii, and H. gibbosus ) [ 15 ]. Compared with previous studies, ultrafast PCR yielded a similar or two orders of magnitude higher sensitivity than that of conventional PCR methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with previous studies, ultrafast PCR yielded a similar or two orders of magnitude higher sensitivity than that of conventional PCR methods. The lower detection limit of the PCR method makes it advantageous for processed seafood products [ 15 ]. Therefore, the suggested ultrafast PCR method could be used as a sensitive method to identify the three ark shell species as well as enable rapid detection using an ultrafast PCR system with the microfluidic chip.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Species substitution is a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Section 403: Misbranded food, which states that “a food shall be deemed to be misbranded if it is offered for sale under the name of another food” ( FDA, 2020 ). Even though species substitution is against the law, shrimp species substitution rates as high as 34%, 16%, and 18% have been reported in Northern Carolina (USA), India, and South Africa, respectively ( Cawthorn and Hoffman, 2017 , Korzik et al, 2020 , Wilwet et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%