2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid detection of hand, foot and mouth disease enterovirus genotypes by multiplex PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of the fact that CVA6 and CVA10 had a rapidly increasing prevalence in recent years (Fig. 1), a pan-enterovirus detection kit with universal primer sets has recently been developed (Shen et al 2018;Wang M et al 2018). Our results support its deployment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In view of the fact that CVA6 and CVA10 had a rapidly increasing prevalence in recent years (Fig. 1), a pan-enterovirus detection kit with universal primer sets has recently been developed (Shen et al 2018;Wang M et al 2018). Our results support its deployment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similarly, Coxsackie viruses infections can be associated with chorioretinitis as reported in just a few cases in the literature [1]. Diagnosing Coxsackie virus infection mainly relies on pathognomic clinical findings and can be supported by laboratory tests such as PCR [10]. Although our patient underwent no anterior-chamber or vitreous-fluid aspiration to detect the Coxsackie virus via PCR or cell culture, our patient’s clinical and funduscopic features are in line with previous case reports [1, 5, 9] and make the diagnosis of an HMFD-associated maculopathy very likely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EVs have traditionally been serotyped by assessment of neutralizing antibody responses in cultured cells; however, since 2000, DNA sequence-based genotyping approaches have become standard practice, with a “type” rather than a serotype name, e.g., Echovirus type 30 rather than Echovirus serotype 30. In recent years, the genetic typing of specimens has grown due to the more rapid and simpler PCR testing for EV detection [15,16], while use of cultured cells are also increasingly being supplanted by molecular approaches due to their low isolation rates. For the identification of the viral type by nucleotide sequence analysis, the VP4-VP2 partial region of the capsid region and the analysis by amplifying the VP1 partial region (CODEHOP RT-semi-nested PCR) are widely used.…”
Section: Enterovirus Amentioning
confidence: 99%