2011
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2010.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid detection of low-abundance K-ras mutation in stools of colorectal cancer patients using chip-based temperature gradient capillary electrophoresis

Abstract: Mutant K-ras provides an independent negative predictive marker for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy in colorectal cancers (CRCs). Rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective screening for K-ras status will overarch rational personalized medicine. Stool-based DNA testing offers unique advantages for CRC screening such as noninvasiveness, high specificity, and patient compliance, whereas complicated procedures and the low sensitivity of the present approaches have hampered its application on a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, considering cancer-derived samples often consist of highly heterogeneous mixtures of stromal cells and cancer cells, lower sensitivity of sequencing analysis (20%) tends to cause false negative results and misconduct the clinical therapy [12]. Consequently, a variety of more sensitive PCR-based screening techniques have been developed, and indicated that methods with high sensitivities could achieve higher mutation detection rate, which will in turn improve the CRC treatment [13][15]. Because only limited hotspot mutations in KRAS codons 12 and 13 are proved to be related to the clinical medicine [16], the simple and cost-effective PCR/restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis has been extensively used to detect KRAS mutations [17][20], which allows the reliable discrimination between wild-type sequences and homozygous or heterozygous point mutations by generating or destructing restriction sites through PCR and subsequent electrophoresis [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, considering cancer-derived samples often consist of highly heterogeneous mixtures of stromal cells and cancer cells, lower sensitivity of sequencing analysis (20%) tends to cause false negative results and misconduct the clinical therapy [12]. Consequently, a variety of more sensitive PCR-based screening techniques have been developed, and indicated that methods with high sensitivities could achieve higher mutation detection rate, which will in turn improve the CRC treatment [13][15]. Because only limited hotspot mutations in KRAS codons 12 and 13 are proved to be related to the clinical medicine [16], the simple and cost-effective PCR/restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis has been extensively used to detect KRAS mutations [17][20], which allows the reliable discrimination between wild-type sequences and homozygous or heterozygous point mutations by generating or destructing restriction sites through PCR and subsequent electrophoresis [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several research studies using small cohorts (<100), it was an overall concordance between tissue and stool for Kras genotype and it was possible to detect mutation even in 1000-fold excess of wild-type Kras (Mixich et al, 2007). The overall results showed that Kras mutations has 34–87.5% of sensitivity for detecting CRC patients and the specificity was very high, reaching in some studies 100% (Dong et al, 2001; Doolittle et al, 2001; Rengucci et al, 2001; Calistri et al, 2003; Chien et al, 2007; Mixich et al, 2007; Zhang et al, 2011a). …”
Section: Mutation Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Zhang et al 53 developed a microchip-based temperature gradient CE system for the detection of low-abundance K-ras mutation, a biomarker for the epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in CRCs. The microfluidic chip was fabricated with glass and had a cross-channel design with sample loading and separation channels of 1.0 and 4.5 cm, respectively.…”
Section: Gel Electrophoresismentioning
confidence: 99%