Different types of
quantitative technology based on infrared spectroscopy
to detect profenofos were compared based on Fourier transform near-infrared
(FT-NIR; 12,500–4000 cm–1) and Fourier transform
mid-infrared (FT-MIR; 4000–400 cm–1) spectroscopies.
Standard solutions in the range of 0.1–100 mg/L combined with
the dry-extract system for infrared (DESIR) technique were analyzed.
Based on partial least-squares regression (PLSR) to develop a calibration
equation, FT-NIR–PLSR produced the best prediction of profenofos
residues based on the values for R
2 (0.87),
standard error of prediction or SEP (11.68 mg/L), root-mean-square
error of prediction or RMSEP (11.50 mg/L), bias (−0.81 mg/L),
and ratio performance to deviation or RPD (2.81). In addition, FT-MIR–PLSR
produced the best prediction of profenofos residues based on the values
for R
2 (0.83), SEP (13.10 mg/L), RMSEP
(13.00 mg/L), bias (1.46 mg/L), and RPD (2.49). Based on the ease
of use and appropriate sample preparation, FT-NIR–PLSR combined
with DESIR was chosen to detect profenofos in Chinese kale, cabbage,
and chili spur pepper at concentrations of 0.53–106.28 mg/kg.
The quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe technique coupled
with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry was used to obtain
the actual values. The best FT-NIR–PLSR equation provided good
profenofos detection in all vegetables based on values for R
2 (0.88–0.97), SEP (5.27–11.07
mg/kg), RMSEP (5.25–11.00 mg/kg), bias (−1.39 to 1.30
mg/kg), and RPD (2.91–5.22). These statistics revealed no significant
differences between the FT-NIR predicted values and actual values
at a confidence interval of 95%, with agreeable results presented
at pesticide residue levels over 30 mg/kg. FT-NIR spectroscopy combined
with DESIR and PLSR should be considered as a promising screening
method for pesticide detection in vegetables.