1994
DOI: 10.1021/es00051a017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid determination of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls in water using solid-phase microextraction and GC/MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
172
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
172
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Both soluble organic compounds in liquid and solid pyrolysis products can be conveniently determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or gas chromatography (GC). By collecting a number of products over different stages of pyrolysis, retention times and the peak area percentages characteristic to each product can be automatically calculated and recorded by GC-MS [17][18][19][20]. Further data or profiles such as the absolute intensity and concentration level can also be automatically calculated by integration and by comparing against standard material databases, such as the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) library.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both soluble organic compounds in liquid and solid pyrolysis products can be conveniently determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or gas chromatography (GC). By collecting a number of products over different stages of pyrolysis, retention times and the peak area percentages characteristic to each product can be automatically calculated and recorded by GC-MS [17][18][19][20]. Further data or profiles such as the absolute intensity and concentration level can also be automatically calculated by integration and by comparing against standard material databases, such as the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) library.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All glassware was silanized with a 10% solution of chlorotrimethylsilane in toluene as described by Potter. 36 For cleaning and decontamination of the glassware and the magnetic stir bars prior to use, they were washed with neutral detergent and deionized water and boiled with deionized water for 10 minutes in a microwave oven, followed by rinsing with deionized water and dried in oven at 70 °C. During the extractions, the samples were thermostated by using a heated circulating bath (Cole Parmer, USA).…”
Section: Reagents and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the LLE method is a useful and traditional method for sample preparation, this technique has many disadvantages such as consumption of large volume of the toxic high-purity solvent, and tedious, time-consuming, emulsion formation, additionally, poor sensitivity for TCEP [18,19]. While SPE could considerably overcome the drawbacks of LLE, SPE cartridges are susceptible to plugging and expensive [20]. In addition, SPE with Oasis HLB cartridges are not suitable for analysis of tris(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (TEHP) [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%