1967
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(67)90028-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid devolatilization of small coal particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase of the particle temperature due to the oxidation of volatiles was also reported by Seeker et al (1981). Devolatilization rates and yields increase with panicle temperature have also been observed in experiments by Kimber and Gray ( 1967) (1973) suggested that oxygen complex fonnation at the surface and char activation may also be important at this early stage of conversion. After the apparent rates reached the maximum, they decreased with time.…”
Section: High Temperature Conversionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…An increase of the particle temperature due to the oxidation of volatiles was also reported by Seeker et al (1981). Devolatilization rates and yields increase with panicle temperature have also been observed in experiments by Kimber and Gray ( 1967) (1973) suggested that oxygen complex fonnation at the surface and char activation may also be important at this early stage of conversion. After the apparent rates reached the maximum, they decreased with time.…”
Section: High Temperature Conversionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Also, the higher the heating rate to the coal particles, the higher the temperature of maximum weight loss rate. High heating rate results in a more extensive thermal fragmentation of coal's molecular structure and suppresses secondary reactions and the loss of fixed carbon [14,15]. Thus, a high heating rate may shift the reactions to a much higher temperature range [16,17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this reaction is the stoichiometric sum of Reactions I and II, this model considers it to be a third, independent gasification reaction. Reaction III, arbitrarily 10. JOHNSON assumed to occur in the development of this model to facilitate correlation of experimental data, has been suggested by Blackwood and McGrory (16) as being necessary in such a system.…”
Section: D(na* + Nao) Jk K2(t)mentioning
confidence: 96%