2015
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2015.1063.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Diagnostic Detection of Plum Pox Virus by Isothermal Amplifyrp® and by Immunostrip®

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PPV detection techniques have had significant improvements in the past few decades, starting from biological tests using indicator plants to serology assays, and then to molecular technologies [ 14 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Because serological methods are easy to use, cost effective, and most results obtained through serological tests agree with the results obtained through PCR or RT-PCR, serological methods are often considered as the most economical and reliable methods for plant virus detections, including PPV [ 14 , 37 ]. During serological tests, polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) can recognize multiple epitopes on viral proteins or virions and thus, the specificity of PAbs always create controversy [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PPV detection techniques have had significant improvements in the past few decades, starting from biological tests using indicator plants to serology assays, and then to molecular technologies [ 14 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Because serological methods are easy to use, cost effective, and most results obtained through serological tests agree with the results obtained through PCR or RT-PCR, serological methods are often considered as the most economical and reliable methods for plant virus detections, including PPV [ 14 , 37 ]. During serological tests, polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) can recognize multiple epitopes on viral proteins or virions and thus, the specificity of PAbs always create controversy [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maejima and others have also reported an immunochromatographic strip using the PAb against the recombinant expressed CP of a PPV-D isolate, and the detection limit of the strip was up to 1:512 dilution for PPV-infected leaf crude extracts [ 14 ]. The commercial immunochromatographic strip made by Agdia Inc. (USA) can be used to detect PPV-D in 1:100 ( w / v ) diluted infected plant tissue crude extracts [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%