2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-016-2220-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid dynamic colour change is an intrasexual signal in a lek breeding frog (Litoria wilcoxii)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many species with neurophysiologically mediated dynamic colour change, such as chameleons, conspicuous display coloration has evolved for social reasons via sexual selection and dynamic colour change allows animals to respond to a social or predatory cue by adjusting their signal according to a potential receiver's visual system (Stuart‐Fox et al ., , ; Stuart‐Fox & Moussalli, ). By contrast, dynamic colour change in frogs is slower because it is hormonally mediated (but see Kindermann et al ., ) and is typically studied in the context of camouflage and thermoregulation (Camargo et al ., ; Tattersall et al ., ); however, studies in species with ephemeral colour differences between the sexes (dynamic sexual dichromatism) indicate that dynamic colour change in frogs may also evolve for social purposes via sexual selection (Wells, ; Ries et al ., ; Doucet & Mennill, ; Sztatecsny et al ., , ; Rehberg‐Besler et al ., ; Kindermann & Hero, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many species with neurophysiologically mediated dynamic colour change, such as chameleons, conspicuous display coloration has evolved for social reasons via sexual selection and dynamic colour change allows animals to respond to a social or predatory cue by adjusting their signal according to a potential receiver's visual system (Stuart‐Fox et al ., , ; Stuart‐Fox & Moussalli, ). By contrast, dynamic colour change in frogs is slower because it is hormonally mediated (but see Kindermann et al ., ) and is typically studied in the context of camouflage and thermoregulation (Camargo et al ., ; Tattersall et al ., ); however, studies in species with ephemeral colour differences between the sexes (dynamic sexual dichromatism) indicate that dynamic colour change in frogs may also evolve for social purposes via sexual selection (Wells, ; Ries et al ., ; Doucet & Mennill, ; Sztatecsny et al ., , ; Rehberg‐Besler et al ., ; Kindermann & Hero, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…), the European moor frog ( Rana arvalis ) and the yellow toad ( Incilius luetkenii ), indicate that temporary divergence in coloration between the sexes prevents costly mistakes in sex recognition when males seek females in aggregations with male‐biased operational sex ratios and scramble competition for mates (Doucet & Mennill, ; Sztatecsny et al ., ; Rehberg‐Besler et al ., ). Similarly, in lek‐breeding stony creek frogs ( Litoria wilcoxii ), yellow coloration in males during amplexus serves as an intrasexual signal that may diminish sperm competition or displacement by other males (Kindermann & Hero, ). By contrast, male Trinidad poison frogs ( Mannophryne trinitatis ) turn black while calling and this colour change appears to play a role in dominance interactions in these highly territorial frogs (Wells, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the striking sexual dichromatism in Eclectus parrots results from intrasexual competition to attract mates and intersexual differences in exposure to visual predators (Heinsohn et al 2005). Likewise, the dynamic sexual dichromatism in frogs that form large breeding aggregations may serve to identify other competing males rather than to attract mates (Sztatecsny et al 2012; Kindermann & Hero 2016; Bell et al 2017b). Consequently, investigating the evolution of secondary sexual characters like dichromatism across ecologically diverse taxonomic groups is essential if we aim to generalize about the function of sexually dimorphic traits and better understand the roles of natural and sexual selection in biological diversification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males from some anuran and fish species, for example, temporarily change color or pattern based on their reproductive success or outcomes from male–male interactions (Doucet & Mennill, ; Korzan, Robison, Zhao, & Fernald, ; Sköld, Aspengren, & Wallin, ). Although this appears to be less common than static signals, this situation raises important questions of signal function in intraspecies interactions (Kindermann & Hero, ; Kodric‐Brown, ; Rhodes & Schlupp, ). One such question is how one state evolves into the other and the evolutionary transition between states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights that many signals have evolved dual functions: They can simultaneously attract females and function in male–male competition (Hunt, Breuker, Sadowski, & Moore, ; Kindermann & Hero, ). A relevant example of this is found in several species of northern swordtails, including Xiphophorus cortezi , which prominently display vertical bars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%