1996
DOI: 10.1029/96tc01973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid emplacement of the Oman ophiolite: Thermal and geochronologic constraints

Abstract: In understanding of ophiolite emplacement requires knowledge of the elapsed time between igneous crystallization and intraoceanic thrusting, and the rate and duration of that thrusting. Hornblende 4øAr/39Ar ages demonstrate that the igneous oceanic crust in Oman crystallized and cooled to-825 K in 1-2 m.y. Hornblende ages from metamorphic rocks and from cross-cutting dikes require that the basal metamorphic thrust fault beneath the ophiolite also cooled below-825 K in 1-2 m.y. Motion along the sole thrust acco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
223
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
10
223
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Jebel Ja'alan is situated in a forebulge position with respect to the Eastern Ophiolite Belt-Batain nappe thrust system, it is unlikely that the loading from this relatively thin nappe stack (<10 km) alone would be sufficient unless thrusting along reactivated faults occurred. The early thrusting (obduction) of the Semail ophiolite was similarly associated with alkaline volcanism [Allemann and Peters, 1972;Robertson et al, 1990;Hacker et al, 1996] which suggests that loading of a continental edge with an ophiolite causes deep-reaching deformation in the continental crust manifested by localized alkaline magmatism due to extension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Jebel Ja'alan is situated in a forebulge position with respect to the Eastern Ophiolite Belt-Batain nappe thrust system, it is unlikely that the loading from this relatively thin nappe stack (<10 km) alone would be sufficient unless thrusting along reactivated faults occurred. The early thrusting (obduction) of the Semail ophiolite was similarly associated with alkaline volcanism [Allemann and Peters, 1972;Robertson et al, 1990;Hacker et al, 1996] which suggests that loading of a continental edge with an ophiolite causes deep-reaching deformation in the continental crust manifested by localized alkaline magmatism due to extension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of subduction initiation may last on the order of only 2-3 My (assuming a convergence rate of ∼5 cm/y) (1), a small fraction of the lifetime of a subduction zone, and is therefore unlikely to be captured by present day observations. Ophiolites that have similar crystallization ages to the metamorphic age of their sole, like the Palawan ophiolite, are not uncommon (19,25,26). These other examples, however, lack dates for the protolith of the sole.…”
Section: Forced Subduction Of Young Buoyant Lithospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metamorphic soles commonly have metamorphic cooling ages that are similar to the igneous crystallization ages of their overlying ophiolites (19,25,26), implying that the overlying ophiolite was still very young or formed during or shortly after subduction initiated. However, because these cooling ages reflect the time of metamorphic cooling and not necessarily the time when the original igneous crust formed, the similarity in ages between the metamorphic sole and overlying ophiolite may be interpreted in several ways: (i) subduction initiation between older lithospheric plates followed by rapid slab rollback and seafloor spreading that generates the ophiolite eventually preserved with the sole (10); (ii) subduction initiation of variably older lithosphere beneath an already active spreading center (27,28); (iii) subduction initiation along weak detachment faults at some distance from a spreading center (12), or (iv) underthrusting of young lithosphere at a spreading center (13) (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White mica, ubiquitous in the host paragneisses and common in mylonitized eclogites, was assumed to be either muscovitic or phengitic based on paragenesis. The 4øArfl9Ar analyses were conducted at the Stanford University geochronology laboratory (see Hacker et al [1996a] for analytical details). Typically, all samples gave highly radiogenic gas fractions requiring atmospheric corrections of 10% or less, and less than 5% on average for white mica, in particular.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%