2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00473.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid evolution in introduced species, ‘invasive traits’ and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potential

Abstract: The damaging effects of invasive organisms have triggered the development of Invasive Species Predictive Schemes (ISPS). These schemes evaluate biological and historical characteristics of species and prioritize those that should be the focus of exclusion, quarantine, and/or control. However, it is not clear how commonly these schemes take microevolutionary considerations into account. We review the recent literature and find that rapid evolutionary changes are common during invasions. These evolutionary chang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
372
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 418 publications
(377 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(122 reference statements)
4
372
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether this variability results from phenotypic plasticity as a response to environmental conditions at the respective site of origin or from genetic adaptation has not yet been evaluated. Both, high phenotypic plasticity (Parker et al 2003;Richards et al 2006) and local adaptation (Dlugosch and Parker 2008;Lee 2002;Whitney and Gabler 2008), are seen as key characteristics for the successful coping of invasive species in new environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whether this variability results from phenotypic plasticity as a response to environmental conditions at the respective site of origin or from genetic adaptation has not yet been evaluated. Both, high phenotypic plasticity (Parker et al 2003;Richards et al 2006) and local adaptation (Dlugosch and Parker 2008;Lee 2002;Whitney and Gabler 2008), are seen as key characteristics for the successful coping of invasive species in new environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such genetic variation may arise after introduction as an evolutionary response to altered environmental conditions, or due to a survival of best adapted genotypes at each provenance. Evolutionary responses may occur within less than 20 generations (Prentis et al 2008;Whitney and Gabler 2008). Especially in plants with a short generation time (Jump and Penuelas 2005) this can happen within a short time-span.…”
Section: Phenotypic Variation Of Early and Late Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive knowledge of sources and invasion routes is needed in this case to successfully disentangle the effects of demographic and stochastic events from selection. So far, although many examples of evolution during biological invasions have been described (see Whitney and Gabler 2008 for a review), it is not always clear whether changes in phenotypic and lifehistory traits during establishment and range expansion reflect adaptive evolution during the invasion process, or neutral changes linked to genetic drift (Keller and Taylor 2008). However, even in cases of clear adaptation, it is not always clear whether adaptation allowed the invasion, coincided with the invasion, or was a consequence of the invasion (Estoup and Guillemaud 2010).…”
Section: Main Insights From Molecular Genetic Studies Of Invasion Routesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…invasibility (Chytrý et al 2008b;Davis et al 2000;Rejmánek et al 2005). Both approaches basically treat species and ''recipient communities'' as static entities with fixed sets of traits (Whitney and Gabler 2008). However, increasing evidence shows that evolutionary or ecological processes can change the behaviour of invader species or modulate their effects (Strayer et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%