2018
DOI: 10.1111/ced.13570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid growth rate is associated with poor prognosis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract: We consider a GR of 4 mm/month as the cutoff point that distinguishes between rapid- and slow-progressing tumours and, more importantly, to identify a subset of high-risk cSCCs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only since the landmark paper by Lipsker, Engel, Cribier, Velten, and Hedelin (2007), in 2007, melanoma have been largely accepted to be subdivided into slow growing or fast growing subtypes with both types corresponding to specific epidemiological, morphological, and metastatic characteristics. While studies mainly focused on the growth kinetics of melanoma growth and its implications for prognosis and management, there are currently very few studies assessing this aspect in the realm of cSCC (Cañueto et al, 2018). Contrary to what we support with this report, Kricker et al (2014) in their study about basal cell carcinoma and cSCC growth rates did not find an overall correlation between time and size of cSCC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, only since the landmark paper by Lipsker, Engel, Cribier, Velten, and Hedelin (2007), in 2007, melanoma have been largely accepted to be subdivided into slow growing or fast growing subtypes with both types corresponding to specific epidemiological, morphological, and metastatic characteristics. While studies mainly focused on the growth kinetics of melanoma growth and its implications for prognosis and management, there are currently very few studies assessing this aspect in the realm of cSCC (Cañueto et al, 2018). Contrary to what we support with this report, Kricker et al (2014) in their study about basal cell carcinoma and cSCC growth rates did not find an overall correlation between time and size of cSCC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The first recognizing ROG as important biological marker in melanoma was Clark et al (1969). While studies mainly focused on the growth kinetics of melanoma growth and its implications for prognosis and management, there are currently very few studies assessing this aspect in the realm of cSCC (Cañueto et al, 2018). While studies mainly focused on the growth kinetics of melanoma growth and its implications for prognosis and management, there are currently very few studies assessing this aspect in the realm of cSCC (Cañueto et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rapid growth rate as a risk factor has been reported in small series with consensus by multidisciplinary guideline committees. 9,26…”
Section: Etiology and Rapid Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardized measurements for presence or absence of actinic histopathologic change, tissue invasion and mitotic index were not available in this population and this limitation may have provided over‐ or underestimates of prevalence or severity for the assessed histopathologic factors. However, a systematic approach to assessment of future biopsies with inclusion of depth of invasion in millimetres, tumour subtype, perineural invasion and Ki‐67 may help to discern whether these criteria are reflective of high risk tumours in dogs as has been documented in people . Tissue invasiveness was found to be associated with histopathologic features of actinic change, but this may have been biased because the actinic designation required a microscopic description whereas the tissue invasion was not uncommonly mentioned in the final diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%