“…The result obtained by this method is reliable, but its strict experimental conditions and complicated procedure make it very time-consuming and non-beneficial to taking subsequent protective or therapeutic measures in time. In recent years, many advances have been involved in overcoming the disadvantages of the traditional method, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), 4,5 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 6,7 loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), [8][9][10] quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), 11 surface plasmon resonance (SPR), 12 flow cytometry (FC), 13 surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), 14 and photochemistry (PC) [15][16][17] techniques. Although the introduction of the above techniques has significantly benefited S. aureus detection, their cost, automation, and sensitivity are still worthy of further improvement.…”