2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04768.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid induction of mucosal healing by intensive granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive aphaeresis in active ulcerative colitis patients without concomitant corticosteroid therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intensive GMAA treatment (twice per week, 10 sessions) was performed as previously described [11,12,16] for all patients with CD. Blood was accessed via the antecubital vein in one arm, and from the outflow blood was returned to patients via the antecubital vein in the other arm through 19 gauge needles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intensive GMAA treatment (twice per week, 10 sessions) was performed as previously described [11,12,16] for all patients with CD. Blood was accessed via the antecubital vein in one arm, and from the outflow blood was returned to patients via the antecubital vein in the other arm through 19 gauge needles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent data demonstrated that ulcerative colitis (UC) patients treated with a twice-a-week regimen (intensive GMAA) could achieve significantly higher ratios of clinical remission and mucosal healing compared with an once-a-week regimen (weekly GMAA) [11,12]. In addition, it was reported that therapeutic effect of GMAA with 10 sessions on active UC patients was superior to that with 5 sessions [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] Several previous studies reported achieving a high remission rate in patients with active UC following GMAA therapy, and Sakuraba's group and our data suggest that intensive GMAA (twice per week) induces higher clinical and endoscopic remission compared with weekly GMAA. 18,19 In addition, our recent data and previous case series revealed that GMAA could be a suitable therapeutic option for patients with active UC prior to starting corticosteroid (CS) therapy because of a striking difference in the clinical response to GMAA between steroid-naïve and steroid-dependent patients. [19][20][21] Furthermore, it was recently reported that GMAA could be safe for UC patients with a history of CMV infection due to the avoidance of colonic CMV reactivation compared with UC patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 In addition, our recent data and previous case series revealed that GMAA could be a suitable therapeutic option for patients with active UC prior to starting corticosteroid (CS) therapy because of a striking difference in the clinical response to GMAA between steroid-naïve and steroid-dependent patients. [19][20][21] Furthermore, it was recently reported that GMAA could be safe for UC patients with a history of CMV infection due to the avoidance of colonic CMV reactivation compared with UC patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs. 22 Theoretically, GMAA removes granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages, where CMV infection is latent and reactivates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental or therapeutic clinical trials using selective leukocytopharesis or depletion strategies for the depletion of granulocytes and/or monocytes are considered to be safe with various levels of efficacy on mucosal healing (16,42). In the present study, by utilizing Rag2 Ϫ/Ϫ mice that are deficient in functional T and B cells, we analyzed the contribution of innate immune components in a murine IBD-like state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%