2019
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid microscope auto‐focus method for uneven surfaces based on image fusion

Abstract: Microscopic imaging of uneven surfaces is difficult because of the limited depth of field. In this study, we developed a rapid auto‐focus method for uneven surfaces based on image fusion. The Prewitt operator was used to detect the vertical edges of the images. Then, the focus position was theoretically calculated using a Gaussian function, and image fusion was applied to obtain the final in‐focus image. An experiment was designed to verify the developed method. The results revealed that this method is effecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six objective representative evaluation metrics were selected in this section, namely SD (calculated by Equations (6) and (7)), SSIM (obtained by Equations (8) and (9)), SF (obtained by Equation (11)), PSNR (calculated by Equations (13) and (14)), Q abf (obtained by Equations (15) and (16)) and AG (displayed in Equation (17)). 6,15 Among them, SD represents the gray-level distribution and contrast of the fused image; SSIM measures the structural similarity between the series of multi-focus nonwoven images and the fused image, thereby evaluating the amount of preserved structural information in the fused image; SF reflects the rate of change of the gray image level, where a higher gray value indicates a clearer fused image; PSNR is used to measure the difference between images; Q abf can assess the amount of edge information preserved in the fused image; and AG reflects the characteristics of the texture transformation. Standard deviation, SD …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Six objective representative evaluation metrics were selected in this section, namely SD (calculated by Equations (6) and (7)), SSIM (obtained by Equations (8) and (9)), SF (obtained by Equation (11)), PSNR (calculated by Equations (13) and (14)), Q abf (obtained by Equations (15) and (16)) and AG (displayed in Equation (17)). 6,15 Among them, SD represents the gray-level distribution and contrast of the fused image; SSIM measures the structural similarity between the series of multi-focus nonwoven images and the fused image, thereby evaluating the amount of preserved structural information in the fused image; SF reflects the rate of change of the gray image level, where a higher gray value indicates a clearer fused image; PSNR is used to measure the difference between images; Q abf can assess the amount of edge information preserved in the fused image; and AG reflects the characteristics of the texture transformation. Standard deviation, SD …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Getting a clear image that contains all relevant objects in one area is the prerequisite for achieving high-precision optical measurements. 6 However, during the image acquisition process of nonwoven fabrics, partially focused images are often obtained instead of completely clear images, since the thickness of the nonwoven material exceeds the depth of field of the microscope. 7 Multi-focus image fusion (MFF) is an effective technique to reconstruct a fully focused image based on a series of partially focused images of the same scene, thus permitting the accurate measurement of object features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These approaches can be categorized into the following groups based on the principles applied. 1) Analyzing images acquired using software algorithm to determine the best focus [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; 2) based on auxiliary laser focusing spot deviation or spot diameter variation [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, ultrasonic methods cannot auto-focus accurately on objects behind the glass [12], thus limiting its usage scenarios. Compared to the conventional AFTs, auto-focusing methods based on digital image processing (DIP-AF) have been found to have the advantages of integrated, miniaturized, and low-cost applications [13], such as digital camera, video camera, and microscope imaging [14,15]. However, little attention has been paid to AFTs with telescope systems, which are critical for capturing large amounts of image information through high-resolution CCDs in applications of astronomy observations [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%