2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.04.20024869
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Motor Fluctuations Reveal Short-Timescale Neurophysiological Biomarkers of Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract: Identifying neural activity biomarkers of brain disease is essential to provide objective estimates of disease burden, obtain reliable feedback regarding therapeutic efficacy, and potentially to serve as a source of control for closed-loop neuromodulation. In Parkinson's Disease (PD), microelectrode recordings (MER) are routinely performed in the basal ganglia to guide electrode implantation for deep brain stimulation (DBS). While pathologically-excessive oscillatory activity has been observed and linked to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metrics were crafted to capture the heterogeneity of motor dysfunction at each time point t . Many of these metrics are based on previous work that employed a similar approach to motor evaluation ( 33 ), albeit in intraoperative patients undergoing DBS implantation with a task that used a joystick, rather than a stylus, to capture data. Notably, this work did not assess patients with ET, nor did it test patients in different stimulation states.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metrics were crafted to capture the heterogeneity of motor dysfunction at each time point t . Many of these metrics are based on previous work that employed a similar approach to motor evaluation ( 33 ), albeit in intraoperative patients undergoing DBS implantation with a task that used a joystick, rather than a stylus, to capture data. Notably, this work did not assess patients with ET, nor did it test patients in different stimulation states.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%