2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339742
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid nanomolar detection of methamphetamine in biofluids via a reagentless electrochemical aptamer-based biosensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E-AB sensors fabricated with the TL aptamer are selective. As in many previous models, , blood serum was chosen as our complex matrix model. The tests were performed with blood serum at room temperature over a concentration range of 20–600 nM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E-AB sensors fabricated with the TL aptamer are selective. As in many previous models, , blood serum was chosen as our complex matrix model. The tests were performed with blood serum at room temperature over a concentration range of 20–600 nM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining four aptamer candidates showed a lower binding affinity that was not significant, where the dissociation constants recorded were higher than 1 micromolar. Nevertheless, an aptamer can exert a higher binding affinity at the nanomolar to sub-nanomolar level against the target, according to previous reports [ 53 , 61 , 62 ]. Interestingly, negative enthalpy changes (ΔH) and entropy changes (ΔS) were recorded for both of the aptamer candidates ( Table 3 ), indicating that the Gibbs free energy may be positive or negative, depending on the temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Of note, although overnight incubation in MCH is commonly employed in the sequential deposition fabrication of EAB sensors, 4,6,13,18 some authors have used shorter periods. 17,19 We find, however, that longer incubation in MCH leads to improved performance for sensors fabricated using the sequential deposition method (Figure S1). Given this, we used overnight MCH incubation as the sequential deposition "standard" against which we performed our comparisons.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Historically, this has been performed by sequentially soaking the gold surface in a solution of a thiol-modified aptamer followed by a second incubation in dilute mercaptohexanol (MCH), which serves to “backfill” the space between aptamers to form a continuous monolayer (Figure ). Since it was first reported for the fabrication of DNA-modified SAMS, this “sequential” method has dominated prior reports of EAB sensor fabrication, which typically employed MCH deposition times ranging from a few hours to overnight. ,,, In contrast to this sequential method, however, there have also been reports in which other, similarly DNA-decorated gold surfaces (e.g., refs ) and, more recently, even EAB sensors , have been fabricated via a “codeposition” method that employs single-step incubation in a mixture of MCH and thiol-modified aptamer (Figure ). To date, however, we have not seen any comparison of the performance of EAB sensors fabricated using these two distinct approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%