2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29264-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid oral bacteria detection based on real-time PCR for the forensic identification of saliva

Abstract: This study developed a new method for forensic saliva identification using three oral bacteria, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Neisseria subflava, combined with a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) system we called OB mRT-PCR. Analytical sensitivity results showed that the target bacteria were amplified at 102–107 copies/reaction, and analytical specificity was assessed using 24 other viruses, bacteria, and protozoa. To evaluate the OB mRT-PCR kit for forensic applications, sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the traditional detection methods, such as immunoassay, PCR is more time-saving, sensitive and accurate. After nearly 40 years development, the PCR molecular detection technology has become the primary method for detecting disease caused by pathogenic microorganisms, and has been widely used in disease detection [2,3], clinical testing [4,5], food quarantine [6,7], forensic identification [8,9], customs inspection [10] and in various other fields [11][12][13][14]. The traditional PCR instrument is large in size and inconvenient to carry; and it has a higher demand for the experimental environment, a special biological laboratory and special laboratory technicians; and its reaction is in a larger volume, consumes more energy, and is not easy to integrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the traditional detection methods, such as immunoassay, PCR is more time-saving, sensitive and accurate. After nearly 40 years development, the PCR molecular detection technology has become the primary method for detecting disease caused by pathogenic microorganisms, and has been widely used in disease detection [2,3], clinical testing [4,5], food quarantine [6,7], forensic identification [8,9], customs inspection [10] and in various other fields [11][12][13][14]. The traditional PCR instrument is large in size and inconvenient to carry; and it has a higher demand for the experimental environment, a special biological laboratory and special laboratory technicians; and its reaction is in a larger volume, consumes more energy, and is not easy to integrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the traditional detection methods, PCR is more time-saving, more sensitive and more accurate. After nearly 40 years of development, the PCR molecular detection technology has become the primary method for detecting disease genes and pathogenic microorganisms, and has been widely used in disease detection [4,5], clinical testing [6,7], food quarantine [8,9], forensic identification [10,11], customs inspection [12] and in various other fields [13][14][15][16]. The traditional PCR instrument is large in size and inconvenient to carry about; it has a higher demand for the experimental environment, a special biological laboratory and special laboratory technicians; and its reaction is in a larger volume, consumes more energy, is more likely to produce by-products, and is not easy to integrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the traditional detection methods, such as immunoassay, PCR is more timesaving, sensitive and accurate. After nearly 40 years development, the PCR molecular detection technology has become the primary method for detecting diseases caused by pathogenic 4 microorganisms, and has been widely used in disease detection [2,3], clinical testing [4,5], food quarantine [6,7], forensic identification [8,9], customs inspection [10] and in various other fields [11][12][13][14]. The traditional PCR instrument is large in size and inconvenient to carry; and it has a higher demand for the experimental environment, a special biological laboratory and special laboratory technicians; and its reaction is in a larger volume, consumes more energy, and is not easy to integrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%