2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid protein separations in ultra-short microchannels: microchip sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a growing number of research groups perform CIEF on chips [81,146,147]. Recently, whole-column detection was introduced to CIEF [21,94,97,148,149], which allows monitoring dynamics of CIEF.…”
Section: Ciefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a growing number of research groups perform CIEF on chips [81,146,147]. Recently, whole-column detection was introduced to CIEF [21,94,97,148,149], which allows monitoring dynamics of CIEF.…”
Section: Ciefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some attempt has been done to achieve this goal, Han et al 95) has introduced chip for SDS separation where the separation could be achieved in less than 2 mm within 30 s using polyacrylamide gel as a matrix for protein molecules ranging from 20 to 200 kDa. While IEF was achieved within tens of seconds in mm-length channel Li et al 96) has proposed a comprehensive chip-alternative for conventional 2DE separation.…”
Section: Coupling Ief With Sds On Chipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conventional CIEF, however, the focused analytes must be transported toward a detection window, which can sometimes decrease the resolution due to a band broadening during transportation [5]. Recently, many IEF techniques using microfluidic devices (microfluidic IEF, MIEF) have been developed to overcome this drawback [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. MIEF has many advantages compared to CIEF, including a short analysis time (within 5 min) due to a short separation channel (several cm) and the requirement of a minimal amount of reagents and samples (several L).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIEF has many advantages compared to CIEF, including a short analysis time (within 5 min) due to a short separation channel (several cm) and the requirement of a minimal amount of reagents and samples (several L). In particular, a short separation length in MIEF makes whole-column imaging possible, which enables real-time observation of an IEF process over the whole length of the microchannel without the requirement of any of the transportation processes necessary for conventional CIEF [9][10][11][12]. More recently, a microfluidic device for two-dimensional electrophoresis was independently developed by Kim and Moon and Yang et al to obtain a higher resolution for analyzing a complicated mixture of biogenic samples [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%