2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-015-1001-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid purging of genetic load in a metapopulation and consequences for range expansion in an invasive plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accumulation of expansion load is predicted to lead to legacies of reduced fitness following expansion [40,41]. Long-range dispersal between multiple introductions from distinct genetic sources could partially mitigate this effect by helping to shelter the genetic load in recently expanded invasive populations [42], but to our knowledge this has not been explored in colonization models.…”
Section: (B) Genetic Load and Inbreeding Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accumulation of expansion load is predicted to lead to legacies of reduced fitness following expansion [40,41]. Long-range dispersal between multiple introductions from distinct genetic sources could partially mitigate this effect by helping to shelter the genetic load in recently expanded invasive populations [42], but to our knowledge this has not been explored in colonization models.…”
Section: (B) Genetic Load and Inbreeding Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weber et al, 2012;Dart & Eckert, 2013) and simulated under different conditions (e.g. Whitlock, 2002;Winn et al, 2011;Marchini et al, 2016), the dynamics of its evolution in natural populations is poorly known and difficult to assess. In L. cavanillesii, it seems likely that sufficient time has elapsed since the origin of SC for the population's genetic load to have been purged (Husband & Schemske, 1996;Crnokrak & Barrett, 2002).…”
Section: Implications For Understanding the Loss Of Si In L Cavanillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the smaller size of geographically marginal populations may simply mean that compatible mates are less available (Busch, 2005). Alternatively, geographically marginal populations may be those that have been more recently colonized from a range core during a range expansion, and they might therefore be experiencing the demographic and genetic effects of recent population bottlenecks (Barringer, Kulka, & Galloway, 2012; Busch, 2005; Darling et al, 2008; Husband & Barrett, 1992; Marchini, Sherlock, Ramakrishnan, Rosenthal, & Cruzan, 2016; Matos Paggi, Palma‐Silva, Bodanese‐Zanettini, Lexer, & Bered, 2015; Pannell, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%