1988
DOI: 10.1016/0305-4179(88)90035-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid quantification of bacterial and fungal growth in burn wounds: biopsy homogenate Gram stain versus microbial culture results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serial dilutions were performed, and skin homogenates were plated in triplicate on blood agar plates (Becton Dickinson). Culture plates were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C and CFUs were counted [10]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serial dilutions were performed, and skin homogenates were plated in triplicate on blood agar plates (Becton Dickinson). Culture plates were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C and CFUs were counted [10]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we included as direct clinical material skin biopsy specimens (14 samples) from infected and noninfected burn wound patients and expectorations from patients with CF (49 samples) and patients without CF (19 samples). Skin biopsy specimens (about 10 mg) were aseptically taken by a surgeon and put in preweighed and autoclave-sterilized microcentrifuge tubes (Eppendorf), one for bacterial culture (26) and one for PCR, and transferred to the laboratory. Once the microcentrifuge tube containing the biopsy specimen arrived in the laboratory, 500 l of the following buffer was added: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), 1 mM EDTA, and 0.5% Tween 20 (nonionic Taqcompatible detergent).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the degree of correlation between surface swab Gram stain and culture in that study was found to be fair. While Gram staining may provide an index of the degree of microbial colonization of the burn wound (125,422), it is not suitable for diagnosing burn wound infection and does not provide information on the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of microbes colonizing or infecting the burn wound.…”
Section: Analysis Of Burn Wound Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%