Rapid, remote and responsive research during COVID-19

Richardson, Jane; Godfrey, Barry; Walklate, Sandra

doi:10.1177/20597991211008581

Cited by 39 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 96 Remote data collection may be less needed in the future, but greater understanding of the pros and cons of these methods of data collection gained during this pandemic (e.g. 97–100 ) may encourage researchers to use them beyond this healthcare emergency. It can potentially also increase the use of methods underused in (AMS) qualitative research, including written or video diaries, photovoice or analysis of print or broadcast media (and many others).…”

Section: Future Directions and Recommendations For Qualitative Resear...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The value, challenges and practical considerations of conducting qualitative research on antimicrobial stewardship in primary care

Wanat

Santillo

Borek

et al. 2022

JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to design appropriate antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes, it is crucial to understand challenges to tackling antibiotic resistance (AMR) specific to each healthcare setting. Antibiotic prescribing in primary care accounts for most prescriptions with a significant proportion considered clinically inappropriate. Qualitative research has a long history in social sciences, but its value and contribution are still contested in medical journals including in the AMR/AMS field. However, through its focus on understanding, meaning making and explaining, qualitative research can offer insights in how to improve AMS efforts in primary care. This paper provides an overview of unique considerations, contributions and challenges related to using qualitative research in AMS to help the AMS community new to qualitative research to utilize its potential most fully. First, we discuss specific considerations for AMS in relation to the stages of conducting a qualitative study, including identifying a research question and choosing a suitable methodology; sampling appropriate participants; planning a recruitment strategy; choosing a method of data collection; and conducting data analysis. These are illustrated with examples of qualitative AMS studies in primary care. Second, we highlight the importance of patient and public involvement throughout all stages of the project and ensuring quality in qualitative AMS research. Finally, drawing on these considerations, we make a further case for the value and contribution of qualitative methodologies in AMS/AMR research while outlining future directions for both AMS and qualitative research, including the need for studies with diverse actors; interdisciplinary collaborations; and complex decisions on methodologies and timelines.

show abstract

Section: Future Directions and Recommendations For Qualitative Resear...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The value, challenges and practical considerations of conducting qualitative research on antimicrobial stewardship in primary care

Wanat

Santillo

Borek

et al. 2022

JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ISVA focus groups were designed to capture ISVA perceptions of how victim-survivors accessing their service experienced police contact throughout the investigation of their case. All fieldwork was conducted during a Covid-19 lockdown which meant focus groups took place via an online video-conferencing app (see Richardson et al, 2021, for a review of this mode of data collection). Participants were recruited by the police force and the ISVA service respectively, using a non-probability sampling approach.…”

Section: The Pilot Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Procedural Justice Theory Approach to Police Engagement with Victim-Survivors of Rape and Sexual Assault: Initial Findings of the ‘Project Bluestone’ Pilot Study

Hohl¹,

Johnson²,

Molisso³

2022

CrimRxiv

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In England and Wales, public trust in the police has been damaged by a series of police failings in rape and sexual assault investigations, officer sexual offending, and a police culture of misogyny. Feminist scholars have analysed why police investigations of rape and sexual assault cases rarely result in a charge and documented the poor experiences many victim-survivors have of the police process. In this article, we outline how this scholarship may be integrated into procedural justice theory to advance our understanding of the impact of how officers engage with victim-survivors on their feelings of the status and value as survivors of sexual violence within the nation and society police represent, as well as on their trust in the police and willingness to (continue) engaging with police, or report future victimisation. We present tentative evidence from a pilot study ('Project Bluestone') in one English police force that suggests a feminist scholarship informed Procedural Justice framework is a promising tool for assessing and improving police practice in engaging with victim-survivors of rape and sexual assault. The article concludes with directions for future research.

show abstract

“…Meanwhile, for practical reasons, research methods are evolving fast. There has been an accelerating trend during the pandemic to try out new methods, with researchers and institutions forced to innovate in order to continue their work (Richardson et al, 2021;Hensen et al, 2021). The pandemic has also made much of that work exceptionally urgent (Van Bavel et al, 2020;Abaluck et al, 2021).…”

Section: Global Debatementioning

confidence: 99%

Replicable quality across every channel: the Busara research agenda on methods in the Global South

Lab¹,

Mughogho²,

Owsley³

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Any act of measurement brings with it concerns about data quality and replication. Yet very little of this work has focused in detail on the specific measurement and data quality concerns related to conducting research in the Global South. Busara operates both remote and in-person data collection, employing everything from photovoice to laboratory ‘games’ to list experiments. Across both of these domains, we will build on our long tradition of careful testing of measures and techniques to ensure high levels of access, response, attention and comprehension. We will examine what methodological practices work best for various populations, especially those with the least social power, in the Global South, to maintain data quality (this differs from our closely related program of work on cross-cultural validation of behavioral science constructs). Busara is well-positioned to do this, and to disseminate protocols for the use of these methods.

show abstract

Rapid, remote and responsive research during COVID-19

Cited by 39 publications

References 27 publications

The value, challenges and practical considerations of conducting qualitative research on antimicrobial stewardship in primary care

The value, challenges and practical considerations of conducting qualitative research on antimicrobial stewardship in primary care

A Procedural Justice Theory Approach to Police Engagement with Victim-Survivors of Rape and Sexual Assault: Initial Findings of the ‘Project Bluestone’ Pilot Study

Replicable quality across every channel: the Busara research agenda on methods in the Global South

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About