2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid repeat infection of SARS-CoV-2 by two highly distinct delta-lineage viruses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NPS and plasma samples were sequenced using amplicon-based protocols using either a MiSeq instrument (Illumina, La Jolla, CA, USA) with ARTIC primers (version 3 for Case 1, version 4.1 for Case 2) or the Clear Dx SARS-CoV-2 WGS v3.0 platform (Clear Labs, San Carlos, CA, USA) for Case 2 only. Detailed protocols and quality control criteria were described previously [ 15 , 16 ]. Illumina sequencing data and Clear Labs consensus genomes were analyzed on Terra.bio using the TheiaCoV_Illumina_PE v2.3.0 and TheiaCoV_FASTA v2.3.0 workflows, respectively, (Theiagen Genomics, Highlands Ranch, CO) [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] with Wuhan-Hu-1/2019 (GenBank MN908947) used as the reference genome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPS and plasma samples were sequenced using amplicon-based protocols using either a MiSeq instrument (Illumina, La Jolla, CA, USA) with ARTIC primers (version 3 for Case 1, version 4.1 for Case 2) or the Clear Dx SARS-CoV-2 WGS v3.0 platform (Clear Labs, San Carlos, CA, USA) for Case 2 only. Detailed protocols and quality control criteria were described previously [ 15 , 16 ]. Illumina sequencing data and Clear Labs consensus genomes were analyzed on Terra.bio using the TheiaCoV_Illumina_PE v2.3.0 and TheiaCoV_FASTA v2.3.0 workflows, respectively, (Theiagen Genomics, Highlands Ranch, CO) [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] with Wuhan-Hu-1/2019 (GenBank MN908947) used as the reference genome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nasal and nasopharyngeal swab specimens were received at the Nevada State Public Health Lab (NSPHL) or Southern Nevada Public Health Lab (SNPHL) and RNA extraction was completed as previously described ( Hartley et al, 2021 ; Tillett et al, 2021 ; Gorzalski et al, 2022 ). Specimens were tested for the presence of coronaviral RNA using FDA-approved kits for clinical laboratories that employed RT-qPCR to detect SARS-COV-2 RNA corresponding to Spike and Nucleocapsid, and a cellular target control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimens were tested for the presence of coronaviral RNA using FDA-approved kits for clinical laboratories that employed RT-qPCR to detect SARS-COV-2 RNA corresponding to Spike and Nucleocapsid, and a cellular target control. Positive specimens were selected for whole genome sequencing using the Clear Labs DX platform and data files from the sequencing reaction were processed as previously described ( Gorzalski et al, 2022 ). The data files are available at GISAID, accession numbers are listed in Supplemental Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%