2013
DOI: 10.3750/aip2013.43.1.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Reproductive Analysis and Length–Weight Relation for Blacktail Snapper, <I>Lutjanus Fulvus</I> (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Lutjanidae), from a Remote Village in Papua New Guinea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our macroscopic evaluations were incorrect (wrong sex and/or reproductive status) for 62.6% of N. isacanthus specimens examined. Similar differences between histological and macroscopic results have been reported previously (Vitale et al 2006, Grandcourt et al 2011, Longenecker et al 2013a, 2013c. Although Mackie and Lewis (2001) report that accuracy of macroscopic staging improves as personnel gain experience, they also state that misclassification rate exceeds 40% for many gonad stages, even when workers are experienced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our macroscopic evaluations were incorrect (wrong sex and/or reproductive status) for 62.6% of N. isacanthus specimens examined. Similar differences between histological and macroscopic results have been reported previously (Vitale et al 2006, Grandcourt et al 2011, Longenecker et al 2013a, 2013c. Although Mackie and Lewis (2001) report that accuracy of macroscopic staging improves as personnel gain experience, they also state that misclassification rate exceeds 40% for many gonad stages, even when workers are experienced.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…We disagree. Using the simplified methods we have described (Longenecker et al 2013a(Longenecker et al , 2013b(Longenecker et al , 2013c(Longenecker et al , 2014 histological analysis is fast and economical. Longenecker et al (2013a) estimated the cost of consumable supplies at $1.45 US per specimen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We use recently developed methods for rapid, low-cost, on-site, histologybased reproductive analysis that requires minimal research infrastructure (Longenecker et al 2013a(Longenecker et al , 2013b. These methods use standard techniques (e.g., plastic embedding) that have been modified such that work can be conducted in remote field settings without electrical service.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%