2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpap.2022.100138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid SARS-CoV-2 disinfection on distant surfaces with UV-C: The inactivation is affected by the type of material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In every case, apart from MDF, elimination of viral particles of over 90% was confirmed, while for MDF, it was 19.9%. The time of exposure to UVC radiation was from 42 to 340 s [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In every case, apart from MDF, elimination of viral particles of over 90% was confirmed, while for MDF, it was 19.9%. The time of exposure to UVC radiation was from 42 to 340 s [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An enhanced understanding of the role of closed communal environments as a source of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission has focused attention on the importance of environmental cleaning and disinfection as a means of reducing disease spread. Established techniques for whole‐room decontamination of public environments such as ultraviolet radiation has demonstrated sufficient efficacy toward the disinfection of SARS‐CoV‐2 ( 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ); however, they are broadly limited to infrequent use in unoccupied and sealed environments due to their harmful radiation effects and long‐term material degradation upon repeated exposure ( 16 , 17 ). Consequently, novel methods of environmental decontamination to augment current SARS‐CoV‐2 infection control procedures are continuously being sought.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%