2016
DOI: 10.1111/are.13003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid sex identification of Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar L.) by real‐time PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variable copy numbers for sdY within salmonid populations have not previously been reported despite the use of real-time qPCR assays for detecting the presence of this gene in chinook salmon 22 and Atlantic salmon 26 . However, variations in copy number for other Y-chromosome markers have been reported by several studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variable copy numbers for sdY within salmonid populations have not previously been reported despite the use of real-time qPCR assays for detecting the presence of this gene in chinook salmon 22 and Atlantic salmon 26 . However, variations in copy number for other Y-chromosome markers have been reported by several studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, the absence of phenotypic males with a female genotype in the present study is intriguing. sdY positive phenotypic females have been previously documented in Atlantic salmon from Tasmania 27 and the Faroe Islands 26 , as well as in populations of north www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ American sockeye salmon 23 and chinook salmon 9,22 . In chinook salmon, similar findings to the present study were reported, whereby all phenotypic males investigated possessed the sdY gene as did a proportion (~2-22%) of phenotypic females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the sdY gene was discovered ( Yano et al, 2013 ), different mechanisms have been invoked to explain the existence of discordant phenotypes such as phenotyping or sampling errors, environment mediated sex reversal, female-specific gene inactivation, sequence variability, the existence of minor sex determining (SD) genes and recombination ( Yano et al, 2013 ; Cavileer et al, 2015 ; Larson et al, 2016 ; Eysturskarð et al, 2017 ; King and Stevens, 2020 ). Recently, a dosage-dependent mechanism has been suggested to explain these discrepancies in Atlantic salmon ( Brown et al, 2020 ), suggesting that sdY is present in a single copy in the male genome and might be also present as partial copies in the female genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discordance between DNA markers for sex and phenotypic sex is not uncommon in fishes, and it is typical in a species displaying a combination of genetic and environmental sex determination ( Hattori et al, 2019 ). However, environmental sex determination has not been reported in the family Salmonidae, and several alternative theories for this discordance have been put forward including phenotyping errors ( Yano et al, 2013 ; Eysturskarð et al, 2017 ), sex reversal ( Nagler et al, 2001 ; Williamson and May, 2002 ; Metcalf and Gemmell, 2006 ), loss of gene function ( Podlesnykh et al, 2017 ), or dose effects ( Brown et al, 2020 ) among others ( Guyomard et al, 2014 ; Larson et al, 2016 ; King and Stevens, 2020 ). Nevertheless, the mechanisms underpinning this discordance are still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic approaches now provide means to accurately and noninvasively determine sex of Atlantic salmon using the male‐specific sdY (sexually dimorphic on the Y‐chromosome) gene (first published by Yano et al, 2013 and further examined by Eysturskarð et al, 2017; Gabián et al, 2019; Kijas et al, 2018; King et al, 2022; King & Stevens, 2020; Lubieniecki et al, 2015; Quéméré et al, 2014). This method is very accurate (>96%), although the sdY gene moved between different chromosomes (Ayllon et al, 2020; Besnier et al, 2020; Eisbrenner et al, 2014; Gabián et al, 2019), likely via transposition (Lubieniecki et al, 2015), so genetic and phenotypic sex have been inconsistent (Brown et al, 2020; King & Stevens, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%