2004 23rd IEEE Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel
DOI: 10.1109/eeei.2004.1361149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid spline-based kernel density estimation for Bayesian networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight is the statistical measure of correlation, denoted I, and calculated by the statistical independence test that is used by the baseline causal discovery algorithm. For example, mutual information for discrete variables and correlation coefficient for continuous variables (with a rapid density estimation, e.g., using Gurwicz and Lerner [2004]). Clustering can then be viewed as partitioning U into disjoint sub-graphs U 1 , .…”
Section: Domain Variable Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight is the statistical measure of correlation, denoted I, and calculated by the statistical independence test that is used by the baseline causal discovery algorithm. For example, mutual information for discrete variables and correlation coefficient for continuous variables (with a rapid density estimation, e.g., using Gurwicz and Lerner [2004]). Clustering can then be viewed as partitioning U into disjoint sub-graphs U 1 , .…”
Section: Domain Variable Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KDE suffers from computational costs making it impractical in many real-world applications. Smooths the density using splines so that it requires fewer coefficients for estimation than the entire training set [19]. The possible continuous feature patterns required for probabilistic inference in a Bayesian network classifier can be calculated by kernel density estimation, letting each pattern influence the shape of the probability density.…”
Section: Naive Bayes Kernelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the distribution described in figure 4 cannot be directly model in the network. Some solutions have been proposed to handle various distributions in a Bayesian network: mixture of truncated exponentials ( [21]) or kernels methods ( [22]). But these types of methods implicate some difficulties for the exact inference, and software are not really exploitable.…”
Section: A Presentation Of the Non-gaussian Casementioning
confidence: 99%