1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02538.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid variability in the synchrotron self-Compton model for blazars

Abstract: Blazars are characterized by large amplitude and rapid variability, indicating that the electron distribution is changing rapidly, often on time‐scales shorter than the light‐crossing time. The emitting region is sufficiently compact to let radiative losses dominate the cooling of high‐energy electrons. We study the time‐dependent behaviour of the electron distribution after episodic electron injection phases, and calculate the observed synchrotron and self‐Compton radiation spectra. Since photons produced in … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
258
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
258
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some more complex models additionally are taking into account the light-crossing time effect (e.g. Chiaberge & Ghisellini 1999;Sokolov et al 2004;Graff et al 2008).…”
Section: Injection Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some more complex models additionally are taking into account the light-crossing time effect (e.g. Chiaberge & Ghisellini 1999;Sokolov et al 2004;Graff et al 2008).…”
Section: Injection Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first part of this work we use the relatively simple model proposed by Chiaberge & Ghisellini (1999) and improved by Katarzynski et al (2008). The model assumes particle acceleration by a shock wave inside a jet.…”
Section: Injection Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the model computation, the geometry of the source is assumed to be spherical, and electrons are constantly injected to reach equilibrium. Synchrotron and SSC losses are taken into account, while electrons can escape from the source with a typical timescale given by t esc (see Chiaberge & Ghisellini 1999). The minimum energy of the injected electron distribution, together with the escape time, are set so as to not overpredict the emission of the lower energy electrons in both the synchrotron and inverse Compton components (i.e., the flat regions of the SED in the radio and X-ray).…”
Section: Spectral Energy Distribution and Emission Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mastichiadis & Kirk (1997), Dermer et al (1997), Chiaberge & Ghisellini (1999), Sokolov et al (2004) and Böttcher (2007). Here, we investigate analytically the influence of a nonlinear electron synchrotron cooling on the synchrotron self-Compton process following the analysis of the flaring of TeV blazars due to the synchrotron self-Compton process for a linear synchrotron radiation cooling behaviour of the injected electrons (Schlickeiser & Röken 2008), where a δ-distribution approximation (Reynolds 1982;Dermer & Schlickeiser 1993) was used for the computation of the inverse Compton scattering rateṅ s .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%