1953
DOI: 10.1051/metal/195350100697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapport entre la forme exacte des courbes de traction des métaux et les modifications concomitantes de leur structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1956
1956
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Crussard-Jaoul analysis [26,27] based on the Ludwik equation [21] and the modified C-J analysis [25] based on the Swift equation [23] returned the same transition points for various work hardening regions A through D as obtained in Table 1. Moreover, fitting of the flow curve by the Ludwik and Swift equations was only possible after estimating their respective fitting parameters for each of the work hardening regions.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Crussard-Jaoul analysis [26,27] based on the Ludwik equation [21] and the modified C-J analysis [25] based on the Swift equation [23] returned the same transition points for various work hardening regions A through D as obtained in Table 1. Moreover, fitting of the flow curve by the Ludwik and Swift equations was only possible after estimating their respective fitting parameters for each of the work hardening regions.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To this end, Jin and Lee [12] preferred the modified Crussard-Jaoul (C-J) analysis [25] based on the Swift equation to delineate the work hardening stages in a Fe-18Mn-0.6C-1.5Al TWIP steel. On the other hand, Dini et al [14] analysed the work hardening behaviour of Fe-31Mn-3Al-3Si TWIP steel with different grain sizes using the C-J analysis [26,27] based on the Ludwik equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensile data illustrate significant systematic changes in deformation behavior with annealing temperature, which are amplified in Figure 6(b), which expands the low strain region to highlight differences in yielding behavior between the five conditions. Observed differences in the strain hardening behavior during continuous deformation (i.e., beyond the yield point elongation (YPE) region for those samples that exhibited YPE) are shown in Figure 7, which presents Jaoult-Crussard analyses [28,29] of the true working hardening rate of the annealed structures as a function of strain. In Figure 7, the logarithm of the true work hardening rate is plotted vs the logarithm of the true plastic strain, and work hardening behavior differences, particularly at low strains, are amplified to illustrate regimes in strain hardening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the strain hardening of the steels was characterized as a function of strain by two approaches. Figure 5 shows a Jaoul-Crussard analysis, which plots the log of the strain hardening rate as a function of the log of the true plastic strain [16,17]. At all levels of plastic strain, the strain hardening increases directly with carbon content of the LIT martensite.…”
Section: Characterization Of Strain Hardeningmentioning
confidence: 99%