2011
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.262881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raptor and Rheb Negatively Regulate Skeletal Myogenesis through Suppression of Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 (IRS1)

Abstract: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is essential for skeletal myogenesis through controlling distinct cellular pathways. The importance of the canonical mTOR complex 1 signaling components, including raptor, S6K1, and Rheb, had been suggested in muscle maintenance, growth, and metabolism. However, the role of those components in myogenic differentiation is not entirely clear. In this study we have investigated the functions of raptor, S6K1, and Rheb in the differentiation of C2C12 mouse myoblasts. We find… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
38
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in contrast to the opposite effects of mTORC and Raptor on in vitro differentiation (19,20), we observed that KD of mTORC and Raptor have identical effects on early satellite cell differentiation in vivo, indicating that the mTORC1 kinase, rather than the individual components, mediates the timing of satellite cell activation. One explanation of these discrepancies is that the microenvironment of the myoblasts at the injury site being different from that in culture, energy-sensing mechanisms differ in their contribution to the differentiation program.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 37%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, in contrast to the opposite effects of mTORC and Raptor on in vitro differentiation (19,20), we observed that KD of mTORC and Raptor have identical effects on early satellite cell differentiation in vivo, indicating that the mTORC1 kinase, rather than the individual components, mediates the timing of satellite cell activation. One explanation of these discrepancies is that the microenvironment of the myoblasts at the injury site being different from that in culture, energy-sensing mechanisms differ in their contribution to the differentiation program.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 37%
“…Rapamycin inhibits the proliferation of primary myoblasts in an S6K-independent manner (14), as well as the differentiation of cultured myoblasts to myotubes upon serum deprivation in vitro (15)(16)(17), but the inhibition can be rescued by a rapamycin-resistant mTORC through a process that involves insulin-like growth factor II (IGFII) but does not require its kinase activity (17,18). Knockdown (KD) of mTORC in myoblasts inhibits their differentiation to myotubes in vitro, but unexpectedly, knockdown of Raptor has the opposite effect (19,20); the role of Rictor, a subunit of the mTORC2 complex, is uncertain, with reports of either inhibition of differentiation (20) or no effect (19) of Rictor KD. From these studies, it is apparent that mTORC can regulate cell growth and division in vitro, that the effect on growth requires S6K whereas that on myoblast division does not, indicating the presence of additional (unknown) mTORC targets, and finally, that mTORC and Raptor regulate the differentiation of cultured myoblasts to myotubes in different ways that are still unexplained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rheb most likely exerts this negative regulation through raptor/ mTOR and suppression of IRS1 (64). This is in contrast to a positive role of Rheb in stimulating muscle hypertrophy (73).…”
Section: Regulation By Mtorc1mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Knockdown of raptor, the defining component of mTORC1, was found to enhance, rather than inhibit, myoblast differentiation (52,64), and overexpression of raptor suppressed myogenic differentiation (64). Evidence suggests that the negative function of raptor in differentiation of C2C12 cells is through serine phosphorylation and destabilization of IRS1 by mTORC1 and subsequent inhibition of PI3K/Akt signaling (Fig.…”
Section: Regulation By Mtorc1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation