2004
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.104.026682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RAR1 Positively Controls Steady State Levels of Barley MLA Resistance Proteins and Enables Sufficient MLA6 Accumulation for Effective Resistance

Abstract: The polymorphic barley (Hordeum vulgare) Mla locus harbors allelic race-specific resistance (R) genes to the powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f sp hordei. The highly sequence-related MLA proteins contain an N-terminal coiled-coil structure, a central nucleotide binding (NB) site, a Leu-rich repeat (LRR) region, and a C-terminal non-LRR region. Using transgenic barley lines expressing epitope-tagged MLA1 and MLA6 derivatives driven by native regulatory sequences, we show a reversible and salt concentrati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
253
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
17
253
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this, reduction of both RAR1 and SGT1 levels results in additive susceptibility for some R proteins (Austin et al, 2002;Azevedo et al, 2002). Thus, while the RAR1-SGT1 interaction is not required for resistance triggered by some R proteins (Figure 4) (Bieri et al, 2004), the SGT1-HSP90 interaction is essential ( Figure 5) (Peart et al, 2002). In the presence of RAR1, the CS domain of SGT1 can simultaneously associate with HSP90-NTD and the CHORD II domain of RAR1 (Figures 6 and 9B).…”
Section: Rar1 Functions To Enhance the Hsp90-sgt1 Interactionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with this, reduction of both RAR1 and SGT1 levels results in additive susceptibility for some R proteins (Austin et al, 2002;Azevedo et al, 2002). Thus, while the RAR1-SGT1 interaction is not required for resistance triggered by some R proteins (Figure 4) (Bieri et al, 2004), the SGT1-HSP90 interaction is essential ( Figure 5) (Peart et al, 2002). In the presence of RAR1, the CS domain of SGT1 can simultaneously associate with HSP90-NTD and the CHORD II domain of RAR1 (Figures 6 and 9B).…”
Section: Rar1 Functions To Enhance the Hsp90-sgt1 Interactionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This interaction should occur between the CS domain and HSP90-NTD. In rar1 mutants, R protein levels are reduced, but not completely (Tornero et al, 2002;Bieri et al, 2004;Holt et al, 2005). Thus, in the absence of RAR1, R proteins can accumulate as a consequence of the HSP90-SGT1 interaction (Azevedo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Rar1 Functions To Enhance the Hsp90-sgt1 Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That is, when destabilized in rar1 mutant background, RAR1-independent proteins like Pi5 might accumulate at relatively high steady-state levels that are above the threshold required for efficient defense responses (Bieri et al, 2004). In contrast, RAR1-dependent proteins like Pib might be present at relatively lower levels than this critical threshold in rar1 mutants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%