2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2010.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rare cell capture in microfluidic devices

Abstract: This article reviews existing methods for the isolation, fractionation, or capture of rare cells in microfluidic devices. Rare cell capture devices face the challenge of maintaining the efficiency standard of traditional bulk separation methods such as flow cytometers and immunomagnetic separators while requiring very high purity of the target cell population, which is typically already at very low starting concentrations. Two major classifications of rare cell capture approaches are covered: (1) non-electroki… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
175
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(220 reference statements)
0
175
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of special interest are cells typically found in small concentrations such as white blood cells, circulating tumor cells and tumor-initiating cells. 1,[11][12][13][14] To separate similar cells, the device must be sensitive enough to distinguish small differences in electrical properties between cells. An example of such separation is the isolation of tumor-initiating cells (TICs), also known as cancer stem cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of special interest are cells typically found in small concentrations such as white blood cells, circulating tumor cells and tumor-initiating cells. 1,[11][12][13][14] To separate similar cells, the device must be sensitive enough to distinguish small differences in electrical properties between cells. An example of such separation is the isolation of tumor-initiating cells (TICs), also known as cancer stem cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Other separation techniques include, but are not limited to biochemical interactions, sheath flow and streamline sorting, dielectrophoresis, fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), and deterministic lateral displacement. 15,16 The end goal of the microfluidic magnetophoresis separators is to incorporate them into a complete lTAS. 17 Magnetophoretic microfluidic platforms when compared to centralized lab based separation techniques have the potential to increase the ability for point-of-care diagnosis, reduce the required sample size, and provide faster sample processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these limitations, lab-on-a-chip (LOC) devices have been widely developed over the last 10-15 y (9, 10); these devices integrate and automate multiple laboratory protocols into a miniature device that employs microfluidic technology to handle small sample volumes on the order of microliters to nanoliters (11). The majority of LOC devices can therefore be used for clinical assays (9) to perform a variety of tasks, including single-cell analysis (12), rare-cell isolation (13), sample preparation, pretreatment or preconcentration (14,15,16), purification (17), fractionation (18), drug screening (19,20), enrichment of rare cells and molecules (21,22), target cells of interest manipulation (23)(24)(25)(26), positioning (27), counting and characterizing (28)(29)(30), DNA analysis (14), protein detection (31), environmental monitoring (32), and the detection of biohazards (33). Among different techniques, the family of electrokinetic phenomena (e.g., electrophoresis, electroosmosis, diffusiophoresis, and capillary osmosis) (34), is perfectly suitable and the most widely used concept in LOC devices for the applications mentioned above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%