2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rare coding variants in DNA damage repair genes associated with timing of natural menopause

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next sought to understand why previous analyses of UKBB WES data missed the associations we report here, and conversely why we did not identify associations with other previously reported genes. Of the seven genes identified by Ward et al 9 , three were also identified by our study (CHEK2, HELB and HROB), three were recovered when we increased our burden test MAF threshold from 0.1% to 1% (DCLRE1A, RAD54L, TOP3A), and an additional gene fell just below our P value threshold when considering variants with <1% MAF (CLPB; P =1.2*10 -5 ). In contrast, our discovery of novel associations that were not reported by Ward et al (BRCA2, ETAA1, PALB2, PNPLA8, SAMHD1 and ZNF518A) were likely explained by differences in phenotype preparation, sample size, variant annotation and the statistical model used (see Supplementary Note and Supplementary Table 3).…”
Section: Exome-wide Gene Burden Associations With Anmsupporting
confidence: 45%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We next sought to understand why previous analyses of UKBB WES data missed the associations we report here, and conversely why we did not identify associations with other previously reported genes. Of the seven genes identified by Ward et al 9 , three were also identified by our study (CHEK2, HELB and HROB), three were recovered when we increased our burden test MAF threshold from 0.1% to 1% (DCLRE1A, RAD54L, TOP3A), and an additional gene fell just below our P value threshold when considering variants with <1% MAF (CLPB; P =1.2*10 -5 ). In contrast, our discovery of novel associations that were not reported by Ward et al (BRCA2, ETAA1, PALB2, PNPLA8, SAMHD1 and ZNF518A) were likely explained by differences in phenotype preparation, sample size, variant annotation and the statistical model used (see Supplementary Note and Supplementary Table 3).…”
Section: Exome-wide Gene Burden Associations With Anmsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…These were confirmed by an independent group of analysts using different QC and analysis pipelines ( Supplementary Tables 1, 2 ). Three of these genes have been previously reported in UKBB WES analysis 9 - we confirm the associations of CHEK2 (beta=1.57 years, 95% CI: 1.23-1.92, P =1.60*10 -21 , N=578 damaging allele carriers) and HELB (beta=1.84, 95% CI: 1.08-2.60, P =4.20*10 -7 , N=120 HC-PTV carriers) with later ANM and a previously borderline association of HROB with earlier ANM (beta= -2.89 years, 95% CI: 1.86-3.92, P =1.90*10 -8 , N=65 HC-PTV carriers). In addition, our previous ANM GWAS analyses 1 identified an individual low-frequency PTV variant in BRCA2 , which we now extend to demonstrate that, in aggregate, BRCA2 HC-PTV carriers exhibit 1.18 years earlier ANM (beta= -1.18, 95% CI: 0.72-1.65, P =2.60*10 -7 , N=323).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations