“…Moreover, the surgical intervention for inverted molars is more challenging than other types of impactions due to the abnormal position of the crown renders it greatly inaccessible that needs extensive bone removal, excessive bone loss as well as nerve damage is the main drawback in such circumstances. Nevertheless, as aforementioned, due to the possible growth of odontogenic cystic or tumorous lesions in future, the inverted impacted maxillary third molar of the present case was surgically extracted together with the right mandibular lesion, as have also been surgically removed in a number of the previously documented cases [8,9,12,15,16]. We reported, to our knowledge, the first case of the co-existence of inverted third impacted maxillary third molar with a mandibular ameloblastoma during the examination of this mandibular lesion.…”