Background
Being aware of the unusual or rare location of thyroid metastases helps in early diagnosis and proper patient management. Rare metastases (RM) can be missed resulting in diagnostic pitfalls and delayed treatment. The use of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients provides precise anatomical localization and characterization of RM that may be missed or misinterpreted in planar whole body iodine-131 (WBI) scan. There is a lack of knowledge about dealing with such patients, the treatment they should receive, and therapy response due to the rarity of such cases. In this work, we reported these rare cases increasing awareness about them and their methods of treatment with response to therapy and evaluated the added value of SPECT/CT imaging in changing patients’ management.
Materials and methods
In this study we reviewed all patients with DTC referred to our unit either for initial radioactive iodine-131 therapy (RAIT) or under follow-up from January 2019 to January 2022. When a suspected lesion was detected in a conventional planar WBI scan whether follow-up scan or post-therapeutic scan, SPECT/CT was acquired immediately in the same session for that region. Additional imaging modalities were performed for confirmation. Response to the given treatment either disease progression (DP) or favorable response which include complete response (CR), partial regression (PR) and stable disease (SD) recorded for each patient.
Results
Two hundred and forty patients with DTC referred to our unit over a three-year period (from January 2019 to January 2022) were reviewed. Forty patients developed lung and bone distant metastases. Twenty-one patients were thought to have metastases at unusual sites. Due to incomplete data (no SPECT/CT pictures or confirmatory imaging), 6/21 patients were eliminated. We studied 15 patients with RM (9 females, 6 males) with a median age of 52 years (range 27–79). All patients received the initial RAIT after thyroidectomy in addition to other therapeutic modalities, e.g., radiotherapy (RTH), chemotherapy (CTH) or surgical tumor excision after detection of RM. Ten out of 15 patients (66.67%) showed favorable response to therapy (2 patients had CR, 6 patients had PR and 2 patients had SD), whereas only 5 patients had DP. Additional SPECT/CT changed management in 10/15 patients (66, 67%) of patients.
Conclusion
RM identification is mandatory to avoid misdiagnosis and delayed therapy. Increasing the awareness about such rare cases allows for better management. SPECT/CT could significantly impact patients' management through its precise anatomic localization and lesion characterization.
