2006
DOI: 10.3989/graellsia.2006.v62.iextra.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rareza, estatus de conservación y sus determinantes ecológicos. Revisión de su aplicación a escala regional

Abstract: RESUMENEn este trabajo se efectúa una revisión crítica sobre la rareza ecológica, las categorí-as de amenaza de las especies y la definición de su estatus de conservación. En la aplicación de los criterios cuantitativos para establecer categorías de amenaza existen numerosos problemas lógicos asociados con la conservación de la biodiversidad, bioló-gicos relacionados con la historia natural de las especies y metodológicos vinculados a aspectos de diseño científico y fiabilidad de los datos. No sería recomendab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
2
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified half of the threatened species as rare, in agreement with the idea of linking conservation problems with the ecological phenomenon of rarity (Carrascal & Palomino 2006). On the other hand, the relationship between the determinants of rarity and the real risk of the conservation of species can also vary greatly depending on distribution, abundance, ecological valence, geographic extension or different levels of human influence (Carrascal & Palomino 2006). Although Homonota taragui and Ameivula sp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We identified half of the threatened species as rare, in agreement with the idea of linking conservation problems with the ecological phenomenon of rarity (Carrascal & Palomino 2006). On the other hand, the relationship between the determinants of rarity and the real risk of the conservation of species can also vary greatly depending on distribution, abundance, ecological valence, geographic extension or different levels of human influence (Carrascal & Palomino 2006). Although Homonota taragui and Ameivula sp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This result is similar to that observed in inventories in RNAG (Zaracho et al 2014) and RNI (Etchepare et al 2013) and it seems to be a general pattern for reptile fauna inventories (Carvajal-Cogollo et al 2007), probably due to the ecology and unpredictable life habits of this group of animals. We identified half of the threatened species as rare, in agreement with the idea of linking conservation problems with the ecological phenomenon of rarity (Carrascal & Palomino 2006). On the other hand, the relationship between the determinants of rarity and the real risk of the conservation of species can also vary greatly depending on distribution, abundance, ecological valence, geographic extension or different levels of human influence (Carrascal & Palomino 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Reptiles (n = 1,648) Birds (n = 2,144) Mammals (n = 1,875) low habitat variety, forest loss, human impacts and climate change (Carrascal & Palomino, 2006;Mainka & Howard, 2010;Nuñeza et al, 2010;Vié et al, 2009), in agreement with theory and empirical evidence that relate population declines with disturbance and habitat homogenization (Echeverrería et al, 2004;Rey Benayas et al, 1999). However, our results show a weak association between rarity and vulnerability of these taxa with climate and human influence variables.…”
Section: Fig 1 Patrón Geográfico De La Riqueza De Species (A-d) Sumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estos índices de conservación integran, para cada especie, un valor de conservación Europeo según la clasificación de BirdLife International (TUCKER y HEAT, 1994), que utiliza el valor de SPECs (Categories of Species of European Conservation Concern) de la UICN (Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza). Estas categorías, cuantitativas, definen límites por debajo de los cuales aumenta el grado de amenaza de una especie y están basados en aspectos vinculados al tamaño poblacional, la extensión del área de distribución y las tendencias temporales actuales, así como sus proyecciones futuras (CARRASCAL y PALOMINO, 2006). Estas categorías se definen según la amenaza de cada especie: Non-SPEC, SPEC 4, SPEC 3, SPEC 2, SPEC 1.…”
Section: íNdices De Conservación De La Avifaunaunclassified