2018
DOI: 10.1101/299354
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ras Suppresses TXNIP Expression by Restricting Ribosome Translocation

Abstract: Oncogenic Ras upregulates aerobic glycolysis to meet the bioenergetic and biosynthetic demands of rapidly growing cells. In contrast, Thioredoxin interacting protein (TXNIP) is a potent inhibitor of glucose uptake and is frequently downregulated in human cancers. Our lab previously discovered that Ras activation suppresses TXNIP transcription and translation. In this report, we developed a system to study how Ras affects TXNIP translation in the absence of transcriptional affects. We show that whereas Ras driv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TXNIP is a potent negative regulator of glucose uptake; in fact, its loss or downregulation is sufficient to increase glucose uptake [19,39], suggesting that low TXNIP levels may be a common route to aerobic glycolysis common in cancer. Consistent with this hypothesis, TXNIP levels are generally lower in tumors compared to normal adjacent tissues [8], and a number of pro-growth/oncogenic pathways suppress TXNIP expression by a variety of mechanisms [19,20,34,[40][41][42]. Together these data suggest that the high demand for ATP driven by translation may result in a reduction of G6P, reduced MondoA transcriptional activity, and low TXNIP expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TXNIP is a potent negative regulator of glucose uptake; in fact, its loss or downregulation is sufficient to increase glucose uptake [19,39], suggesting that low TXNIP levels may be a common route to aerobic glycolysis common in cancer. Consistent with this hypothesis, TXNIP levels are generally lower in tumors compared to normal adjacent tissues [8], and a number of pro-growth/oncogenic pathways suppress TXNIP expression by a variety of mechanisms [19,20,34,[40][41][42]. Together these data suggest that the high demand for ATP driven by translation may result in a reduction of G6P, reduced MondoA transcriptional activity, and low TXNIP expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…CHX induced TXNIP in MEFs and in MEFs that expressed an activated allele of HRAS (Fig. 4a) [34]. Further, TXNIP was induced by CHX-treatment in MEFs that lack the TSC2 tumor suppressor and in MDA-MDA-231 cells, which is a triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line that harbors an inactivating mutation in TP53 and activating mutations in KRAS and BRAF (Fig.…”
Section: Mondoa and Txnip Are Required For The Cytotoxic Effects Of Rocamentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TXNIP is a potent negative regulator of glucose uptake, in fact its loss or downregulation is sufficient to increase glucose uptake (19,40), suggesting that low TXNIP levels may be a common route to aerobic glycolysis common in cancer. Consistent with this hypothesis, TXNIP levels are generally lower in tumors compared to normal adjacent tissues (8), and a number of pro-growth/oncogenic pathways suppress TXNIP expression by a variety of mechanisms (19,20,35,(41)(42)(43). Together these data suggest that the high demand for ATP driven by translation, may result in a reduction of G6P,…”
Section: Protein Synthesis Inhibition Drives G6p Productionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…PHB1 and PHB2)and their sequestration in the cytosol, which prevents Raf localization to the plasma membrane and its activation by Ras(45). Given our previous findings that that Ras-Raf signaling prevents MondoA transcriptional activity and TXNIP expression(35,41,42), it is possible that RocA-driven inhibition of Ras-Raf-MEK signaling also contributes to the increase in MondoA transcriptional activity we observe with RocA treatment.Finally, MondoA is required for the adaptive transcriptional program driven by RocA and accounts for ~20% of the RocA-induced changes in gene expression. Consistent with our recent demonstration that TXNIP and its paralog ARRDC4 are the principal direct MondoA targets in response to acidosis (12, 13, 16), their expression is also highly MondoA-and RocA-dependent in these experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%