2007
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RASER: A new ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging method

Abstract: A new MRI method is described to acquire a T(2)-weighted image from a single slice in a single shot. The technique is based on rapid acquisition by sequential excitation and refocusing (RASER). RASER avoids relaxation-related blurring because the magnetization is sequentially refocused in a manner that effectively creates a series of spin echoes with a constant echo time. RASER uses the quadratic phase produced by a frequency-swept chirp pulse to time-encode one dimension of the image. In another implementatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
134
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows that spatially encoded methods do not require FT processing for delivering their imaging information: the signal's magnitude, |S(t)|, is the image being sought. We and others have discussed elsewhere how this property, which in turn is closely linked to experiments put forward by Kunz and Pipe decades ago (17-19), allows spatially encoded MRI to cope efficiently with field inhomogeneities and to deal simultaneously with multiple sites possessing different chemical shifts (14)(15)(16). These advantages, however, were also found to materialize at a decreased efficiency in terms of the spatial encoding's use of the acquisition time variable, which usually results in spatial resolution penalties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It follows that spatially encoded methods do not require FT processing for delivering their imaging information: the signal's magnitude, |S(t)|, is the image being sought. We and others have discussed elsewhere how this property, which in turn is closely linked to experiments put forward by Kunz and Pipe decades ago (17-19), allows spatially encoded MRI to cope efficiently with field inhomogeneities and to deal simultaneously with multiple sites possessing different chemical shifts (14)(15)(16). These advantages, however, were also found to materialize at a decreased efficiency in terms of the spatial encoding's use of the acquisition time variable, which usually results in spatial resolution penalties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In the present study, we relied on a straightforward ''hybrid'' 2D implementation of the single-scan acquisition (13,15,16), whereby spatial encoding and conventional k-encoding act along orthogonal y and x axes, respectively (Fig. 1e).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although further optimizations could yield improved spectral and spatial resolution as well as added sensitivity, the current results already show that SPEN-based sequences can be utilized as a modality for fast dynamic imaging. Further developments are in progress to exploit additional benefits of spatiotemporal encoding, such as a built-in restricted FOV capability [24,26], multi-echo experiments and parallel imaging acquisition [34]. Representative metabolic images from a rat following injection of hyperpolarized [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First introduced for the acquisition of 2D NMR spectra in a single scan [19,20], spatiotemporal encoding (SPEN) utilizes a chirped pulse combined with a gradient for a sequential manipulation of the spins that can directly monitor their density in real space [21,22]. In an imaging context, SPEN uses such a manipulation along the low-bandwidth domain in combination with a conventional k-space readout, leading to a so-called hybrid acquisition mode [23,24]. Hybrid SPEN has a higher robustness against magnetic field inhomogeneities than EPI, reflecting the larger bandwidths it can access for the spatially sequential excitation and detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%