Raskid ugovora prema Konvenciji UN o medjunarodnoj prodaji robe

Abstract

The breach of a international sales contract by one party gives the other party a right to recover damages, but we are here concerned with more specialized remedy - avoidance of the contract. In the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) as in national legal systems, avoidance is not available for every breach of contract. The question whether the party affected by the disturbance may avoid the contract instead of being restricted to a claim for damages or other remedies with the contract continuing in force, depends of the seriousness of the breach of contractual obligation. In the Convention, a party may avoid the contract when the other party commits a 'fundamental breach'. The party affected by breach must suffer a detriment which must be such 'as substantially to deprive him of what he is entitled to expect under the contract unless the party in breach did not foresee and a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances would not have foreseen such a result'. The definition of 'fundamental breach of contract', as a fruit of world-wide compromise, is not always easy to apply both for the parties and the judges and it's notions of 'substantial detriment' and 'foreseeability' may give rise to divergent judicial interpretation and application. .

Financial obligations and contract termination

“…7 Navedena pitanja biće predmet analize u ovom radu, sa osvrtom na rešenja koja su sadržana u Prednacrtu Građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije. 8…”

“…Kod dvostranih (dvostrano obaveznih) ugovora, kada jedna ugovorna strana ne ispuni svoju obavezu, druga strana može zahtevati ispunjenje obaveze ili raskinuti ugovor prostom izjavom, ukoliko raskid ugovora ne nastupa po 9 Grebović, N. (2004). Raskid ugovora u međunarodnom trgovinskom pravu, Pravo i privreda, (5)(6)(7)(8), str. 857.…”