2010
DOI: 10.1159/000331266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RASopathies: Clinical Diagnosis in the First Year of Life

Abstract: Diagnosis within Noonan syndrome and related disorders (RASopathies) still presents a challenge during the first months of life, since most clinical features used to differentiate these conditions become manifest later in childhood. Here, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical records referred to the first year of life of 57 subjects with molecularly confirmed diagnosis of RASopathy, to define the early clinical features characterizing these disorders and improve our knowledge on natural history. Mildly or m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
100
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
11
100
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of these disorders -NS, CFCS, CS and LS -share numerous similarities of phenotypic features, making the differential diagnosis challenging, particularly prenatally and in newborns. 1,5 Until now, heterozygous variants in 13 genes of this pathway (PTPN11, SOS1, RAF1, BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, SHOC2, CBL, A2ML1 and RIT1) have been documented to be causally associated with NCFCS. 3,[11][12][13] Currently, because of genetic heterogeneity, only the most prevalent disease genes are assessed in routine molecular diagnosis of the NCFCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four of these disorders -NS, CFCS, CS and LS -share numerous similarities of phenotypic features, making the differential diagnosis challenging, particularly prenatally and in newborns. 1,5 Until now, heterozygous variants in 13 genes of this pathway (PTPN11, SOS1, RAF1, BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, SHOC2, CBL, A2ML1 and RIT1) have been documented to be causally associated with NCFCS. 3,[11][12][13] Currently, because of genetic heterogeneity, only the most prevalent disease genes are assessed in routine molecular diagnosis of the NCFCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3 The diagnosis of such disorders is particularly difficult to perform in utero and in the first years of life, as most features manifest later during childhood. 4,5 Therefore, molecular analysis has become an important key for the verification of clinical diagnosis and represents a highly informative prognostic tool, with direct impact on the establishment of individual follow-up plans. 6,7 Heterozygous mutations in 11 genes associated with the RAS/MAPK signaling pathway have been causally linked to these disorders: PTPN11 (MIM 176876), SOS1 (MIM 182530), RAF1 (MIM 164760), BRAF (MIM 164757), MAP2K1 (MIM 176872), MAP2K2 (MIM601263), KRAS (MIM 190070), HRAS (MIM 190020), NRAS (MIM 164790), SHOC2 (MIM 602775) and CBL (MIM 165360).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying core signaling components utilized by both NS-and NSML-related disorders could offer new insight into the progression of these diseases and potentially suggest novel therapeutic strategies to treat the more severe manifestations of NS. The identification of therapeutic approaches that can target both NS-and NSML-related cardiomyopathies as a unified therapy will provide a novel clinical utility, given the apparent challenge in diagnosis between NS and NSML, particularly within the first year of life (13,14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, 22 patients with NS with p.Thr42Ala have been reported in literature (Table 1). 12, 13, 15, 17, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 However, data were limited because of the lack of a detailed description of their clinical features (Table 1). Among these reported patients with NS with p.Thr42Ala mutation in PTPN11 , ASD or atrioventricular canal defect (AVCD) were reported in six patients (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%