Rate‐All‐That‐Apply (RATA) comparison of taste profiles for different sweeteners in black tea, chocolate milk, and natural yogurt

Abstract

Growing health concerns have increased interest in reducing the consumption of added sugars, which can be achieved by substituting or replacing sugar with sweeteners to maintain sensory intensity and quality. The growing availability of sweeteners has increased the complexity of the perceptual landscape as sweeteners differ in the qualitative, intensity, and temporal properties. A sweetener that can match the perceptual properties of sucrose in different food matrices is likely to have broad applications. In complex foods, sweetness is influenced by the taste interactions with the existing tastants and possible matrix effects that influence release and perception of sweetness. The current study compared the taste properties of three food matrices (black tea, chocolate milk, and natural yogurt) sweetened by sucrose to those sweetened using eight different sweeteners (acesulfame-K, aspartame, erythritol, luo han guo (Mogroside), palatinose (isomaltulose), stevia (Reb-A), sucralose, and sucrose-allulose mixture) using Rate-All-That-Apply. The sensory properties of each sweetener differed across matrices, with sucrose-allulose mixture, aspartame, erythritol, palatinose, and sucralose having the most similar taste to sucrose across all foods. By contrast, acesulfame-K, stevia, and luo han guo had taste profiles that most varied from sucrose, characterized by side tastes such as bitterness, chemical taste, and a low sweetness. Sweeteners differed most from sucrose when presented in natural yogurt compared to tea and chocolate milk. A food's taste properties can suppress sweetness intensity and promote undesirable side tastes. Taken together, these findings highlight the importance of testing sweeteners in complex foods and help identify sweeteners and sweetener combinations that can replicate the sweetness of sucrose and support sugar reduction.Practical Application: Food manufacturers and researchers can refer to the results of the sensory profiles to identify suitable sweeteners substitutes for sucrose in foods with similar taste profiles to those tested. The current article highlights important changes to sweetener sensory properties when presented in different complex foods, and provides an indication of the potential for calorie reduction by substituting sucrose with a range of low or no calorie sweeteners.

Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of obesity: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank

“…In this same trial, the authors have also found changes in hormone levels, such as appetite-suppressing hormone PYY and hunger hormone ghrelin, and an increase in the eating rate during the ultra-processed diet [14]. In a more recent study based on pooled data from five previously published reports of food energy intake rates, ultra-processed foods had an energy intake rate twice as high as that observed among unprocessed foods (69.4 and 35.5 kcal/min, respectively) [28]. This can be explained by the oro-sensory properties of the ultra-processed foods (e.g.…”

The sensory properties and metabolic impact of natural and synthetic sweeteners

“…Furthermore, higher concentrations are perceived as being more intense and long lasting, with very little differences observed between scaling methods (Lawless & Skinner, 1979). When used in a matrix, sucrose retains its sweetness profile and has fewer cited side tastes as compared to synthetic or natural substitutes (Tan et al., 2020, Wagoner, McCain, Foegeding, & Drake, 2018). Thus, a successful sugar replacement must match the rapid rise and fall of sweetness, with the lack of additional side tastes characteristic of sucrose.…”

Low‐sugar strawberry yogurt: Hedonic thresholds and expectations

“…One means of reducing the sugar content in processed foods has been the use of low‐calorie sweeteners. It is widely accepted that aspartame, neotame, stevia, and sweetener blends play an important role in the sensory aspects of acceptance and consequently affect the consumers' hedonic response to yogurts (Hernández‐Morales, Hernández‐Montes, & Villegas‐de Gante, 2007; Kalicka, Znamirowska, Buniowska, Esteve Más, & Canoves, 2017; King, Arents, & Duineveld, 2003; King, Lawler, & Adams, 2005; Miele et al, 2017; Pinheiro, Oliveira, Penna, & Tamime, 2005; Tan, Wee, Tomic, & Forde, 2020). These substances deliver high levels of sweetness without increasing the caloric intake (Carocho, Morales, & Ferreira, 2017).…”