1993
DOI: 10.1086/173361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rate Coefficients for Charge Transfer of He + with C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier calculated rate coefficients for removal of He + ( 2 S) by C or O were found to be too small to affect the ejecta models [3,6]. We note that charge exchange crosssections and rates for collisions of Si with He + were considered recently by Satta et al [32] using the multi-channel Landau-Zener approximation (MCLZ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Earlier calculated rate coefficients for removal of He + ( 2 S) by C or O were found to be too small to affect the ejecta models [3,6]. We note that charge exchange crosssections and rates for collisions of Si with He + were considered recently by Satta et al [32] using the multi-channel Landau-Zener approximation (MCLZ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…4, we also plot the rate coefficients for direct charge transfer from Kimura at al. [3], which become larger than the radiative charge transfer process for temperature greater than 3 000 K, approaching 7 × 10 −13 at 10 000 K.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…we do not expect these reactions to significantly affect the atomic carbon abundance, despite the increased H + and He + abundances produced by the higher cosmic ray ionization rate. The reason for is that, in contrast to reaction 3, which proceeds at close to the Langevin rate (Anicich & Huntress 1986), reactions 4 and 5 occur only very slowly, since both have rate coefficients that are roughly a million times smaller than that of reaction 3 (Kimura et al 1993;Stancil et al 1998).…”
Section: Effect Of Varying the Cosmic Ray Ionization Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use charge transfer rates taken from Rutherford et al (1971), Rutherford et al (1972), Arnaud & Rothenflug (1985), Pequignot & Aldrovandi (1986), Kimura et al (1993), Swartz (1994), Kingdon & Ferland (1996), Stancil et al (1998) and Zhao et al (2004). For reactions where no measured or calculated rates exist, we use the recipe for estimating rates given by Pequignot & Aldrovandi (1986).…”
Section: Charge Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%